Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes44%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 91 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Today’s news about Cesar Chavez is shocking and deeply disappointing. He was someone millions of Americans, especially Latino families growing up in this country, looked up to and respected.
The DEATH BETS Act would ban contracts on assassinations, deaths of world leaders, and acts of war on platforms like Polymarket. This story shows exactly why that matters.
This is what prediction markets on life and death actually look like in practice. This is exactly why I introduced the DEATH BETS Act with Senator Adam Schiff.
This is totally insane. A war correspondent received death threats from online gamblers who wanted him to change his reporting on an Iranian missile strike so they could collect a payout. One bettor risked $900,000. He told the journalist he knew where he lived and who his family members were.
The video is appalling. Our kids won’t always get along. But settling differences with hateful language and violence is never acceptable.
In the years to come, I look forward to having the opportunity to ban California offshore drilling once and for all. Our coastline and our communities deserve better than this.
The profits flow to Texas and Wall Street, not to California consumers. The safety record does not hold up, and the environmental risk is simply not worth it.
The last time oil flowed through these pipelines, a corroded pipe burst and spilled more than 100,000 gallons of crude oil, killing hundreds of birds and marine mammals and closing beaches for months. That was 2015.
This is infuriating. Trump is exploiting an unauthorized war in Iran to resurrect one of California’s worst environmental nightmares.
Instead they want to make voting harder. Every American who believes in fair elections, regardless of party, should be asking why. #SAVEActTaxesVoting
If Republicans were serious about election integrity, they would be working with us to fund election infrastructure and making it easier for every eligible citizen to cast a ballot and have it counted.
this bill demands. The costs and the bureaucratic hurdles fall hardest on the very people who already face the most barriers to participation. For millions of eligible voters, it is effectively a tax on voting.
It was always about making it harder for eligible American citizens to vote. Requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register sounds reasonable until you realize millions of Americans, veterans, seniors, rural residents, working parents, and others do not have easy access to the documents
Noncitizen voting is already illegal, already extremely rare, and already prosecuted when it occurs. Every credible study confirms this. Election officials will tell you the same thing. Which means this bill was never about protecting elections.
Reposted byMike Levin
Six brave American service members came home in flag-draped caskets on March 7. Less than one week later, a Trump-linked PAC put donate buttons next to their photo. These families were still in the first raw days of grief. There is a word for this: desecration.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3187 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-15S. 284 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-12H.R. 3668 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 2550 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 432 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3898 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3383 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-11H.R. 3638 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H.R. 3628 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-11H. Res. 939 (119th)Kill the motionPRESENTNOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 432 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-10S. 1071 (119th)Motion to CommitYESYESFailed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-10H. Res. 936 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-10H.R. 1676 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-09S. 356 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1049 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-04H.R. 1069 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 1005 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 4305 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-12-03H.R. 2965 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-02H. Res. 916 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-02H.R. 4423 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-12-01H.R. 5348 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 3109 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H. Res. 893 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 6019 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 4058 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 11Next →