Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Voting Record — 592
Yes46%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 100 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Prosecutors admitted the damage came from a “hasty and botched” $14 million renovation, not vandalism, and acknowledged they would never have sought Hearn’s indictment if they had been given the facts from the start. Trump’s response? “I disagree 100%… it was a pure case of VANDALISM.”
Then Jeanine Pirro, hardly known for being skeptical of Trump, reviewed the evidence and reached the opposite conclusion.
Trump’s own Justice Department just exposed one of his biggest lies. For weeks, Trump insisted “vandals” destroyed the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. His administration arrested Americans, including 67-year-old U.S. Olympian David Hearn, based on that claim.
This is your daily reminder that Trump and Republicans are spending billions of your tax dollars on an unauthorized war in Iran and Stephen Miller’s ICE agenda while gutting Medicaid, slashing SNAP, and driving up your health care costs.
The most recent assessment said we needed 4 or 5 ships. We are buying 11. It’s yet another example of Trump disregarding Congress altogether and Republicans doing nothing to stop him. This is not how our system is supposed to work.
Finnish shipyards build some of the finest icebreakers in the world. These are specially built ships designed to force a path through frozen ocean. Then came a late night phone call from Trump, and suddenly the US was buying more than double the icebreakers the Coast Guard said it needed.
Finland’s leader handed Trump a framed picture of an icebreaker at a golf tournament last year. I’m not trying to pick on Finland, a beautiful country and a genuine friend to the United States.
$7 billion more in no-bid contracts personally approved by Trump, with no approval from Congress. By the time lawmakers found out, the deal was announced and the companies were already celebrating. One of them is run by a CEO who gave $1.7 million to Republicans. How did this happen?
The public deserves to know why hundreds of Trump-linked accounts were closed, why so much of the record remains under seal, and whether a sitting president’s personal financial interests are influencing the exercise of public power.
When a president’s private business disputes and public authority begin to overlap, everyone should pay attention. We’ve seen this pattern before. In 2019, during his first term, Trump sued Capital One and Deutsche Bank to block them from complying with congressional subpoenas seeking his records.
The banks say they acted for legitimate business and compliance reasons. The courts will decide those cases. What is not in dispute is that while these lawsuits are pending, Trump is using the power of the presidency to push regulators toward policies that make it harder for banks to take action.
There is a separate lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase involving accounts it also closed during roughly the same period. Trump says the banks engaged in politically motivated debanking.
Instead, it surfaced in a federal court filing on a Friday afternoon and is being largely forgotten by Monday. And it wasn’t just one bank.
If any other president’s businesses had hundreds of bank accounts terminated after an anti-money-laundering review by one of the nation’s largest banks, it would dominate the news cycle.
The Trump Organization had roughly 385 accounts closed by Capital One after the bank’s anti-money-laundering team spent months reviewing them. Imagine the reaction if this involved any other prominent political family.
They are handing the machinery of federal law enforcement to Trump’s personal defense lawyer, the new Roy Cohn, on the strength of paper that may not bind him at all.  When Blanche uses that power the way his whole record says he will, they will not be able to say they did not see it coming.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
592 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division AYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 12Next →