This is not just wrong. It’s absolutely idiotic.
Clean energy is lowering costs and creating American jobs right now. Abandoning pollution limits doesn’t help our economy, it weakens it and hands our competitors an advantage.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 581
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The new rule is, “Give us your social media or don’t visit America.” The result is millions of tourists stay away.
Hotels, restaurants, and small businesses lose billions.
Jobs disappear while other countries take our visitors and our money.
Just unbelievably dumb.
Reposted byMike Levin
Reminder that Trump and Republicans are pouring billions of your tax dollars into ICE raids and crackdowns, while gutting Medicaid and SNAP and driving up health care costs.
Families are get crushed by rent, groceries, prescriptions. They chose fear and cruelty while working people pay the price.
Reminder that Trump and Republicans are pouring billions of your tax dollars into ICE raids and crackdowns, while gutting Medicaid and SNAP and driving up health care costs.
Families are get crushed by rent, groceries, prescriptions. They chose fear and cruelty while working people pay the price.
Reposted byMike Levin
The health costs of failing to fix the Tijuana River crisis are far too high for families and our service members to pay. Our delegation has secured $653M since I arrived in Congress in 2019, and real progress is finally underway.
But the job isn’t finished.
I’ll keep fighting until it’s done.
Reposted byMike Levin
This is just idiotic.
More pollution means more hospital visits, more floods and fires, higher insurance, higher food and energy costs, and billions in taxpayer disaster relief.
At the same time, we’re handing clean energy jobs and manufacturing to China. Trump and Republicans want us to literally pay more to get sicker and weaker.
Total economic and environmental malpractice.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/09/c...
This is just idiotic.
More pollution means more hospital visits, more floods and fires, higher insurance, higher food and energy costs, and billions in taxpayer disaster relief.
The health costs of failing to fix the Tijuana River crisis are far too high for families and our service members to pay. Our delegation has secured $653M since I arrived in Congress in 2019, and real progress is finally underway.
But the job isn’t finished.
I’ll keep fighting until it’s done.
Reposted byMike Levin
It’s worth briefly explaining what happened with a vote in the House late last night, because it’s significant:
Mike Johnson and House Republican leaders tried to keep blocking Congress from voting on whether to roll back Trump’s tariffs on countries like Canada.
This is the choice in Washington: Trump’s tariffs or lower prices for you.
I know which side I’m on.
Nonpartisan experts estimate these tariffs cost the average household about $1,300 a year.
Republican leaders tried to protect that tax instead of protecting families.
Trump’s tariffs are a massive hidden tax on working families.
Foreign countries don’t pay them.
You do.
At the grocery store. At the mall. At the auto shop. When you replace an appliance.
Now we can force votes to lower costs, bring prices down, and stop this administration from re-imposing the same tariffs without Congress.
Here’s why this matters:
All but three House Republicans voted to protect those tariffs and protect Trump. They chose party loyalty over your paycheck.
But joined by three Republicans, we stopped them in a 217–214 vote.
It’s worth briefly explaining what happened with a vote in the House late last night, because it’s significant:
Mike Johnson and House Republican leaders tried to keep blocking Congress from voting on whether to roll back Trump’s tariffs on countries like Canada.
Stephen Miller isn’t just advising Trump.
He’s running the show.
From reckless ICE raids to impossible arrest quotas to silencing anyone who urges restraint, Miller is the shadow president.
He’s setting the agenda, shaping the cruelty, and driving the chaos. www.bbc.com/news/article...
Reposted byMike Levin
Six of my colleagues in Congress, all veterans, told service members a basic truth: you never have to follow an illegal order. That’s settled law and part of their oath.
Yet Trump’s Justice Department somehow tried to turn that into a crime.
This case never should have been brought. It was political retaliation, and completely disgraceful. www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
Fortunately, a grand jury rejected it altogether.
That’s because reminding service members to follow the Constitution and their oath is not sedition.
It’s patriotism.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History581 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
581 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12