Elections should be decided by voters, not politicians rigging the game for Trump’s benefit.
That’s why Prop 50 gives Californians the power to decide if we’ll push back, temporarily, and ensure fair representation across the country.
I voted YES, and I hope you will too.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Trump Administration is sending tens of BILLIONS of US taxpayer dollars to support Argentina but is not interested in spending a similar amount to make sure millions of Americans can keep their health care next year.
That tells you everything.
“If there is a shutdown, I think it would be a tremendously negative mark on the president of the United States. He’s the one that has to get people together.”
- Donald Trump, 2011 on the Today Show
Reposted byMike Levin
Mike Johnson said he doesn’t want to call Republicans back to DC during the shutdown because they’re doing “some of the most meaningful work” of their careers at home.
What a total joke.
Come back to DC and do your jobs.
Reposted byMike Levin
Speaker Johnson has illegally and unconstitutionally refused to swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva for more than a month, denying Arizona voters their right to representation in Congress.
Her election is certified.
His obstruction is partisan and indefensible.
The Trump Administration is sending tens of BILLIONS of US taxpayer dollars to support Argentina but is not interested in spending a similar amount to make sure millions of Americans can keep their health care next year.
That tells you everything.
Speaker Johnson has illegally and unconstitutionally refused to swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva for more than a month, denying Arizona voters their right to representation in Congress.
Her election is certified.
His obstruction is partisan and indefensible.
Mike Johnson said he doesn’t want to call Republicans back to DC during the shutdown because they’re doing “some of the most meaningful work” of their careers at home.
What a total joke.
Come back to DC and do your jobs.
Mike Johnson is letting the House stay home while the government is shut down. Here’s the kicker:
Members of Congress will still be paid on Nov. 1 unless they personally ask not to. I’ve done that. But our staff won’t get a dime. What kind of boss pays him or herself while their team goes unpaid?
Reposted byMike Levin
“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”
-FDR
Remember this when you talk about SNAP and WIC losing funding on Nov. 1.
And remind Trump and his enablers.
“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”
-FDR
Remember this when you talk about SNAP and WIC losing funding on Nov. 1.
And remind Trump and his enablers.
Cheap energy is clean energy.
That’s why I’ve worked with my friend Sean Casten to develop the Cheap Energy Agenda and finally bring relief to working families burdened by high energy costs.
I’m back in D.C. again this week ready to work to reopen government and protect health care for millions of Americans.
But for the fifth week in a row, Mike Johnson still has House Republicans out of town on vacation.
It’s an absolute disgrace.
Every working family in my district deserves a vacation more than the House Republicans who refuse to do their jobs, come back to DC, and work with us to end this shutdown.
thehill.com/homenews/hou...
The Trump administration is refusing to tap the contingency funds Congress set aside to keep SNAP running.
Over 40 million Americans could lose food assistance starting Nov 1.
This is not a policy debate, it’s a moral failure—and I support California’s lawsuit to stop it.
Reposted byMike Levin
Millions of Americans are about to go hungry as food aid runs dry on Nov. 1, but Trump isn’t focused on ending the shutdown.
Instead, he’s obsessed with building a $300 million gilded ballroom funded by his billionaire friends.
While families struggle to eat, he’s polishing the gold.
Millions of Americans are about to go hungry as food aid runs dry on Nov. 1, but Trump isn’t focused on ending the shutdown.
Instead, he’s obsessed with building a $300 million gilded ballroom funded by his billionaire friends.
While families struggle to eat, he’s polishing the gold.
Reposted byMike Levin
It’s been 38 days since the House last held a vote.
No appropriations bills.
No committee work.
No progress.
Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to even swear in duly elected Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva.
Enough excuses. Bring the House back to work and do your job.
It’s been 38 days since the House last held a vote.
No appropriations bills.
No committee work.
No progress.
Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to even swear in duly elected Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva.
Enough excuses. Bring the House back to work and do your job.
Reposted byMike Levin
Don’t forget this Yale & Penn study finding Republicans would cause 51,000 preventable DEATHS every year by gutting healthcare and food aid.
Democrats have been fighting to stop this from the beginning, and we won’t back down.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.