I’m ready to support a responsible, bipartisan budget that lowers costs and protects access to care for families, seniors, and communities across the country.
So far, those in charge have shown no willingness to begin to fix the damage they have done or engage in any real negotiations.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Their deep Medicaid cuts and other changes are already driving up costs for tens of millions of Americans and forcing hospitals and community health centers to scale back or close, creating a real health care crisis.
Republican leaders control the House, Senate, and White House. They pushed through a partisan bill and then left town while government funding is about to expire.
If they refuse to negotiate and a shutdown happens, the responsibility is theirs.
First they slashed food aid, and now they are canceling the USDA’s decades-old food insecurity survey so no one can measure the harm. For 30 years, this data has guided policy and fed hungry families. Ending it while so many struggle is inexcusable and dangerous. www.wsj.com/economy/trum...
Reposted byMike Levin
We must get answers on why a bribery probe with a $50,000 bag of cash and promises of future contracts was shut down by the FBI. www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/t...
We must get answers on why a bribery probe with a $50,000 bag of cash and promises of future contracts was shut down by the FBI. www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/t...
Reposted byMike Levin
A new investigation reveals powerful interests skirting environmental rules for profit.
Choosing between a strong economy and a healthy environment is a false choice—real progress delivers good jobs, clean air, and safe communities without cutting corners.
www.propublica.org/article/elon...
A new investigation reveals powerful interests skirting environmental rules for profit.
Choosing between a strong economy and a healthy environment is a false choice—real progress delivers good jobs, clean air, and safe communities without cutting corners.
www.propublica.org/article/elon...
Reposted byMike Levin
Have any of your loved ones been affected by cancer?
Does anyone think it's a remotely good idea for the White House to SHUT DOWN CANCER RESEARCH?
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/m...
Have any of your loved ones been affected by cancer?
Does anyone think it's a remotely good idea for the White House to SHUT DOWN CANCER RESEARCH?
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/m...
Reposted byMike Levin
Democracy works only when elected officials put the public first—not themselves.
Right now, too many in Washington are breaking that trust. 🧵👇🏻
RFK Jr is undermining proven vaccines in a way that will leave fewer kids protected, raise infection risks, and discourage companies from developing new vaccines. Politics over science puts families at risk and weakens our ability to fight future health threats. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/h...
Reposted byMike Levin
I rarely agree with Ted Cruz, but on this we’re united: he called FCC Chair Brendan Carr’s bid to suspend Jimmy Kimmel “right out of Goodfellas” and “dangerous as hell.”
Using government power to punish speech we dislike threatens everyone—left, right, or center.
I rarely agree with Ted Cruz, but on this we’re united: he called FCC Chair Brendan Carr’s bid to suspend Jimmy Kimmel “right out of Goodfellas” and “dangerous as hell.”
Using government power to punish speech we dislike threatens everyone—left, right, or center.
Reposted byMike Levin
What are we fighting for?
To stop the Republican-made health care crisis, cancel the cuts, lower the costs, and save your healthcare.
Let’s work together, keep the government open and stop a reckless shutdown.
What are we fighting for?
To stop the Republican-made health care crisis, cancel the cuts, lower the costs, and save your healthcare.
Let’s work together, keep the government open and stop a reckless shutdown.
Reposted byMike Levin
The nation’s leading scientific advisory body just confirmed that greenhouse gases endanger our health. The EPA’s move to undo the protections that cleaned our air and lowered costs is reckless and ignores overwhelming evidence.
We cannot let decades of progress be erased.
Reposted byMike Levin
Even Justice Alito wrote in 2017 that under the First Amendment, the government “may not ban speech on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend.”
Disagreeing doesn’t give government the power to silence speech.
The nation’s leading scientific advisory body just confirmed that greenhouse gases endanger our health. The EPA’s move to undo the protections that cleaned our air and lowered costs is reckless and ignores overwhelming evidence.
We cannot let decades of progress be erased.
Reposted byMike Levin
We have been kept in the dark about sweeping executive branch overhauls driven by Trump’s budget director Russ Vought.
Republicans have largely looked the other way.
Congress cannot negotiate responsibly when treated like less than a coequal branch.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.