Gwen Moore headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Wisconsin District 4
Born
April 18, 1951
Age 75
Phone
(202) 225-4572
Office
2252 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4

Gwen Moore

Gwendolynne Sophia Moore is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Wisconsin's 4th congressional district since 2005. In 2016, Moore was elected to serve as caucus whip of the Congressional Black Caucus for the 115th United States Congress. She is a member of the Democratic Party. Her district is based in Milwaukee and as a result of the 2011 redistricting also includes some Milwaukee County suburbs: Bayside, Brown Deer, Cudahy, Fox Point, Glendale, St. Francis, South Milwaukee, West Milwaukee, Shorewood, and Whitefish Bay. Moore is the first woman to represent the district and the second woman after Tammy Baldwin and the first African American elected to Congress from Wisconsin.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Gwen Moore headshot
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 202 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The American people didn’t ask for this. Hiring has stalled, prices are surging, and this administration is actively undermining the labor market Democrats rebuilt. This goes beyond failed Republican leadership, it's actively making life harder for people.
NEW: The labor market is worse than previously thought, with the latest data showing the U.S. created about 106,000 total jobs in the past three months, the weakest pace of growth since the onset of the 2020 pandemic.
When @pocan.house.gov and I go around to different parts of Wisconsin, we find a common theme: Wisconsinites are terrified of losing their health care.   We will keep showing up and sharing the truth about what the WI GOP reps voted for.
Republicans could have extended the ACA credits that keep private health insurance premiums affordable in their big tax giveaway to billionaires and corporations. But they didn’t. Now health care premiums are set to spike. www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/rc...
Wisconsin! Smoke from wildfires in Canada is creating poor air quality conditions in much of the state today. Please consider staying indoors or limiting time outside, especially if you have a preexisting condition where the air quality may make breathing difficult.
In their 60 years, Medicare and Medicaid have provided millions of Americans with access to health care. But Republicans just voted to make the biggest cuts to these programs since their inception! All to fund tax giveaways for the wealthiest Americans.
Republicans’ bonanza for billionaires falls short for working families. While Democrats advanced a Child Tax Credit that lifted up low-income and middle-class families, Republicans’ Child Tax Credit leaves many struggling  families behind.
In their Big Ugly Bill, Republicans could have chosen to enact common sense poverty-reducing measures, such as expanding the EITC, but instead they passed legislation that’s going to force millions of people off of health care, all to pay for PERMANENT tax cuts for the rich.
“If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?" - Donald Trump, Sept. 2016 to a crowd of supporters.   Here is a video of Jeffrey Epstein confirming he is a friend of Donald Trump and pleading the 5th when asked if they ever socialized together with underage girls.
This week marks 15 years of Dodd-Frank, groundbreaking legislation that protects American consumers from the excesses of Wall Street.   But now Republicans are working to bring us back to a time where big banks & predatory companies can gamble with American's livelihoods.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11