
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 516
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 202 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I’m committed to being accessible to my constituents and making sure they know they have someone fighting for them in Washington.
I won’t stop working to defend their rights and hard earned benefits.
Join me tomorrow in Bay View for a town hall!
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
I was honored to join a special luncheon celebrating the awarding of the Congressional Gold Medal to the Six Triple Eight— the only Black, all-female unit to serve in Europe during World War II. Thank you, @repgwenmoore.bsky.social, for introducing this bill that honors these incredible women!
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
I was proud to cosponsor and vote in support of @repgwenmoore.bsky.social’s bill to recognize their service to our nation with the Congressional Gold Medal.
Today on #DenimDay, we wear denim to affirm our commitment to believing survivors and advocating for justice. What someone wears is never an invitation. There is no excuse.
⬆️costs
⬆️chaos
⬆️corruption
Trump has returned to the Oval Office with the same unpredictable, grievance-fueled leadership style as Trump 1.0, but without any sort of guardrails.
If Q1 is any indication of America’s new “Golden Age,” we should all be gravely concerned.
So proud that the Congressional Gold Medal was presented to the 6888 today -- the first and only all-Black, all-women battalion to serve overseas in World War II.
This recognition is a powerful reminder that the full story of American heroism must be told in all its diversity.
100 days in to Trump 2.0, America is predicted to have the lowest economic growth AND the highest inflation rate of any developed economy in 2025.
#winning
100 days in to Trump 2.0, America is predicted to have the lowest economic growth AND the highest inflation rate of any developed economy in 2025.
Trump is breaking every promise to make life easier for hardworking Americans.
🚨"Trump said that he would regard it as a “total victory” if tariffs are at 20, 30 or 50% on imports next year. [That] scenario would mean American consumers would face far higher prices, effectively a massive tax increase."
100 days of Trump’s Golden Age.
www.cnn.com/2025/04/28/p...
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
America’s seniors are having to make a hot lunch out of Cheez-Its and Craisins because Trump cut their food aid so that millionaires can get their fat tax handout. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/28/u...
$8 BILLION worth of clean energy projects have been canceled under Trump 2.0.
That’s not even including the lost job opportunities.
Donald Trump and the Republican party are bad for the environment, bad for manufacturing, and bad for American workers.
www.manufacturingdive.com/news/inflati...
The arrest of Judge Dugan is an unmistakable scare tactic by an Administration that has blatant disregard for judicial independence and the rule of law.
I stand with all public servants who continue to serve in the face of intimidation.
I will be on with @kaitlancollins.bsky.social at the top of the hour
Children who are poisoned with lead or at risk for lead poisoning should not bear the burden of a haphazard ‘restructuring plan.'
RFK Jr. must IMMEDIATLEY restore the CDC's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch and answer MPS' request for assistance.
See more
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History516 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
516 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.