Doris O. Matsui headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 7
Born
September 25, 1944
Age 81
Phone
(202) 225-7163
Office
2206 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 7

Doris O. Matsui

Doris Okada Matsui is an American politician, who has served as a member of the United States House of Representatives from California's 7th congressional district since 2005. She succeeded her husband, Bob Matsui. The district, numbered as the 5th from 2005 to 2013 and the 6th from 2013 to 2023, is based in Sacramento.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 7

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Doris O. Matsui headshot
Doris O. Matsui
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 7
SoupScore
Doris O.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

In the midst of a shutdown, President Trump has decided Argentina matters more than the American people. Giving $20 billion to another country while you fire your own workforce, raise health care costs, and leave American farmers struggling is not “America First”.
Republicans have shut down the government rather than lower your health care costs. People across our community are already getting their health care rate notices and I want to hear from you. [1/2]
There can be no delay in delivering additional aid, restoring essential services, and building the stability needed to ensure this agreement holds. There is still difficult work ahead. [2/3]
The ceasefire underway in Gaza has brought long-awaited hope—the remaining hostages reunited with their families and a surge of humanitarian aid delivered to the Palestinian people who have endured unbearable loss. [1/3]
I'll continue working side by side with our Tribal Nations to uplift their voices, protect their rights and land, and advance the priorities that strengthen their communities for generations to come. [2/2]
From Stockton Blvd. to Florin Square to Midtown, our city is a place where small businesses can flourish. But Republicans have decided that supporting our entrepreneurs and protecting their access to affordable health care is an afterthought in their pursuit of cruel, misguided policies. [1/2]
Democrats are united in the fight to protect your health care. Republicans think they can mislead the public and get away with it, but the American people see what they're really doing: raising costs and ripping away coverage. We’re not backing down.
Florin Square is the heart of South Sacramento's vibrant Black-owned small businesses. If Republicans let the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credits expire, premiums could double. That’s make-or-break for small business owners who are already stretched thin. They deserve a fair shot, not higher costs.
In the face of pleas from the spouse of a military member living paycheck to paycheck with children whose lives rely on medication, Speaker Johnson continues to blame Democrats. That's not leadership. Speaker Johnson, do your job—bring back the House and let's get to work for the American people.
Every storefront on Stockton Blvd tells a story—of hard work, of family, of perseverance. It’s a place where diverse cultures intersect. Where generations of small business owners work hard to lift up their community. I won’t let Republicans play political games with their health and future.
Thank you, @coveredca.bsky.social , for joining me to sound the alarm. The numbers don’t lie—without action, health care costs will soar. Republicans’ refusal to extend the ACA tax credits is a direct attack on our community. We will keep fighting to make sure every Sacramentan can afford care.
Jessica Altman of CoveredCA hosted Rep. Rep. Doris Matsui to discuss the impact on #Sacramento if the #ACA's enhanced premium tax credits expire at the end of the year. Premiums would rise by 97% on average and 111% in Rep. Matsui's district.
The law is clear. Federal workers are required to receive back pay after a shutdown. This is yet another act of cruelty and disregard from this Administration toward hardworking public servants. I stand with our federal workers against these reckless, baseless attacks.
Families in Sacramento and across the country are united: extend the ACA tax credits. Republicans are out of step with the American people. They need to listen to their constituents and get back to work.
Most Americans, including most Republicans and MAGA supporters, say they want Congress to extend the ACA enhanced premium tax credits that help make Marketplace coverage more affordable. https://on.kff.org/4q7ElGy
KFF graph showing that more than 3 in 4 adults (78%) support extending the enhanced premium tax credits for Affordable Care Act Marketplace coverage, based on a KFF Health Tracking Poll from September 23-29, 2025.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 10Next →