Doris O. Matsui headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 7
Born
September 25, 1944
Age 81
Phone
(202) 225-7163
Office
2206 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 7

Doris O. Matsui

Doris Okada Matsui is an American politician, who has served as a member of the United States House of Representatives from California's 7th congressional district since 2005. She succeeded her husband, Bob Matsui. The district, numbered as the 5th from 2005 to 2013 and the 6th from 2013 to 2023, is based in Sacramento.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 7

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Doris O. Matsui headshot
Doris O. Matsui
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 7
SoupScore
Doris O.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I fully support AG Bonta's lawsuit to block a Nexstar TEGNA merger. Allowing it would mean rewarding corruption, less competition, weaker local news, and higher costs for consumers. We can't allow Trump even more power to silence local stories and voices.
AG Pam Bondi has done infinitely more to circumvent Congress than she has to deliver justice for the victims of Jeffery Epstein and his accomplices. Pam Bondi is making a mockery of our Justice Department and needs to resign.
When an FCC Chair threatens broadcasters for reporting facts and targets broadcasters that anger the President, every American should pay attention. This is bigger than one network or one story. It is an attempt to silence scrutiny, shape coverage through fear, and erode a free press.
I believe women, and I stand with those who have had the courage to speak out. No movement can remain strong without accountability. Our commitment is to the truth, to farmworkers, and to ensuring that these values are upheld without exception. [2/2]
The farmworker movement has always stood for dignity, justice, and the protection of the most vulnerable. That mission must guide us now. The allegations of abuse by Cesar Chavez that have come forward are deeply painful. We must listen to survivors with humility and compassion. [1/2]
Today I joined @politico.com for a conversation on the future of our wireless communications networks. 6G will transform how we connect with each other and the world around us. The economic and national security stakes in the global race to lead this technology couldn’t be higher. [1/2]
Photo: Rod Lamkey
Behind the scenes today recording a weather emergency preparedness PSA with the one and only @jimcantore.bsky.social! No luck required when you’re prepared. Happy St. Patrick’s Day 🍀
More long-distance power lines connecting California with the plains and south would bring cheap clean wind power to California in exchange for our abundant solar power. It's a win-win for the climate, lowering utility bills, and increasing national grid resilience during dangerous weather events.
We have the solutions to reduce power plant pollution and keep the lights on, and we're pioneering it in California. While the east coast faced a deadly winter storm, California had plentiful solar power. [1/2]
Trump and Carr are threatening broadcasters for doing their jobs. That is intimidation and a direct threat to the First Amendment. A free press matters most in times of war. I will hold Carr accountable and fight any attempt to silence broadcasters.
Their leadership was underestimated even as their impact on our communities was undeniable. And still, they moved us forward. They changed neighborhoods, opened doors, built institutions, and made it possible for others to dream bigger. That spirit is part of Sacramento’s legacy. [2/2]
Thank you to the Sacramento History Museum and the Sacramento County Commission on the Status of Women and Girls for bringing us together during Women’s History Month. For generations, women had to fight to be recognized. For women of color, those barriers were even greater. [1/2]
This project will integrate student housing, academic space, innovation hubs, cultural venues, and hospitality. It’s about bringing students closer to opportunity and reinvigorating downtown Sacramento. [2/2]
I am proud to have secured $2 million in federal funding for Sacramento State's Capital Campus. For generations, Sac State has been an engine of opportunity for our region. It has educated leaders, fueled innovation, and strengthened our workforce. [1/2]
I am horrified by the violence today at Temple Israel in West Bloomfield and Old Dominion. Antisemitism and gun violence have no place in our country. My heart is with all those impacted by these tragedies. Everyone deserves to worship and learn in safety, free from fear and violence.
“Support our troops” isn’t a slogan — it’s a promise that demands follow-through, robust and timely resources, and a fully staffed system ready to serve our servicemen and women. [2/2]
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 10Next →