Jeff Merkley headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Oregon
Born
October 24, 1956
Age 69
Phone
(202) 224-3753
Office
531 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Oregon

Jeff Merkley

Jeffrey Alan Merkley is an American politician who is the junior United States senator from Oregon. He was first elected to the Senate in 2008. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 1999 to 2009 as the representative for the 47th district in the Oregon House of Representatives, which covers central Multnomah County on the eastern side of Portland, Oregon; he was the speaker of the Oregon House of Representatives during the last two years of his tenure.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 785
Yes26%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jeff Merkley headshot
Jeff Merkley
U.S. SenatorDemocratOregon
SoupScore
Jeff's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 93 sponsored · 412 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans created a health care crisis: skyrocketing premiums, rural hospitals closing, folks kicked off insurance.   Democrats want to fix it.   Trump and Rs control Congress and the White House—they'd rather shut down the government than fix health care for you and your family.
My trip to Israel, the West Bank, Jordan, and Egypt with @vanhollen.senate.gov made clear that the Netanyahu government is pursuing a strategy of forced displacement by reducing homes to rubble and more deprivation of food, water, and medicine.
We will never be able to repay our debt to the firefighters and first responders who ran toward danger on September 11, 2001. Today, we reflect on those we lost that day and in the 24 years since and grieve with all those feeling the deep pain of loss.
The Trump family raked in $5,000,000,000 from its crypto con last week. This is CORRUPTION on full display—and it’s why I wrote the End Crypto Corruption Act. NO WAY should elected officials and their families be profiting from crypto schemes.
Voting by mail is convenient, secure, and helps counter attempts to corrupt Election Day—like understaffing voting centers in certain precincts—designed to obstruct voting in targeted communities. Trump’s plan to kill vote by mail is a power grab, plain and simple. HELL NO!
Why stop there? Let’s rename all Depts after what Trump is inflicting on America. Dept of HHS -> Dept of Hepatitis and Human Suffering Dept of VA -> Dept of Veteran Abandonment Dept of Education -> Dept of Erasure of History Dept of Commerce -> Dept of Corruption Just a start.
JUST IN: President Trump will rename the Defense Department the Department of War, the White House confirmed
Powerful men abused and exploited underage girls, and the Trump Administration is trying to cover it up. We need to pass @lujan.senate.gov’s and my Epstein Files Transparency Act NOW to release the files!
What's on brand is Trump thinking a shiny, new name will make Americans forget that Republicans cut health care for 15 million people.   No matter what they call it, Trump and Republicans betrayed working families.   And that can't be rebranded. www.politico.com/live-updates...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
785 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16