The EEOC must remain an independent civil rights watchdog—not a tool for targeting communities with “reverse DEI” probes and demanding universities provide Nazi-style lists of Jewish staff members.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12
Jerrold Nadler
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes36%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting11%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 12
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 148 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission cannot be weaponized to serve Trump’s agenda. We are witnessing a disturbing push to legitimize discrimination, ignore credible claims, and undermine real enforcement for vulnerable workers.
By restricting the mailing of this vital drug, a radical judge stripped away one of the few lifelines left for women across the country living in health care deserts and states that restrict access to abortion.
apnews.com/article/abor...
Women’s health and bodily autonomy are under attack.
A right-wing judge appointed by Donald Trump just ruled to restrict access to safe abortions. 2 out of 3 abortions in the United States are made possible by the FDA-approved, safe and clinically effective drug mifepristone.
Donald Trump and Sean Duffy have no legal basis to stand on—I look forward to seeing them fail in court, again.
www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news...
The Trump administration is trying in vain, once again, to make life harder for New Yorkers by targeting congestion pricing in court. Congestion pricing has reduced emissions, increased MTA revenue, and improved daily commutes for New Yorkers by cutting down time spent in traffic.
This legislation rips food off the table of millions of vulnerable Americans and worsens the Republican-led affordability crisis.
I voted NO on this horrible bill.
While Americans are struggling to meet their basic needs due to skyrocketing costs at the grocery store, gas pump, and doctor's office, Republicans crafted a Farm bill that locks in $187 Billion dollars in SNAP cuts.
Congress must strike the right balance between protecting national security and protecting Americans’ civil liberties as warranted by the Fourth Amendment. That balance does not exist within the current FISA Section 702, and therefore, I voted NO on this bill.
FISA Section 702 must be reformed to require a probable cause warrant for intelligence agencies to search through Americans’ personal information held in the 702 database. This bill is woefully insufficient because it lacks that requirement.
Additionally, Congress must reform the Supreme Court to bring balance back to a court that has skewed so far to the right in recent years that it has lost sight of its fundamental mission to provide equal justice under the law.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Now more than ever, Congress must pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to protect all Americans' fundamental right to vote in free and fair elections.
Today's SCOTUS decision eviscerates the Voting Rights Act in ways that should send shivers down the spine of American democracy. In this verdict, the Court bowed to the wishes of MAGA Republicans and gutted the Voting Rights Act – opening the door for the disenfranchisement of millions of Americans.
TPS holders support 390,000 U.S. citizen children and contributed $29 billion annually to the U.S. economy. Ending TPS would be senseless cruelty—tearing families apart and weakening communities across the country.
#ProtectTPS @hispaniccaucus.bsky.social
I am proud to introduce the PROTECT Act to stop Donald Trump from using taxpayer-funded buildings for his personal vanity projects, because New Yorkers deserve public spaces that they can respect, not monuments to tyranny and corruption.
Donald Trump is a convicted felon, a twice impeached president, and America’s chief insurrectionist. His name is unfit to honor our nation’s buildings.
I am honored today to lead New York elected officials and advocates demanding a transparent rebuilding process for Penn Station with strong public oversight.
This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to improve the busiest transportation hub in the United States. But the Trump administration is grossly mishandling the process by conducting backroom negotiations without public oversight.
The Penn Station renovation project will be a multi-billion dollar investment in our community, using New Yorkers' tax dollars, and the Trump administration has failed to provide any of the necessary details–no public hearings have been held, and no cost estimates have been shared.
This pre-approved funding is essential to keeping New Yorkers safe as they travel to home, school, and work.
I am grateful that @newyorkstateag.bsky.social and @governor.ny.gov y.gov are fighting to restore funding for our roads and bridges.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-13 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-12 | H. Res. 873 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H. Res. 719 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-19 | H.R. 5371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 1047 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3015 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-18 | H.R. 3062 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 713 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5143 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H.R. 5125 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-17 | H. Res. 722 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 5140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 4922 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H.R. 2721 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-16 | H. Res. 707 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.R. 3400 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.