House Republicans just passed the largest cuts to healthcare and food assistance in American history, just to give billionaires a massive tax break. I voted NO because working families shouldn’t pay the price for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Jersey District 1
Donald Norcross
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes35%
No48%
Present0%
Not Voting17%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Donald Norcross
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Jersey District 1
SoupScore
Donald's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 67 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Leader @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social just broke the record for the longest speech on the House floor, showing the American people just how important it is to stop the vote on the Big Ugly Bill.
Bummer the Republicans weren’t here to see it.
This bill will hurt the people who can least afford it. I’m voting NO. South Jersey families deserve better.
The Republican budget bill is a direct attack on working families in South Jersey.
❌ Nearly 100,000 people in our community could lose SNAP.
❌ More than 160,000 could lose Medicaid.
❌ Almost 14,000 students could lose their Pell Grants.
I've been at the Capitol all night and into this morning debating Trump's big, ugly bill that will take healthcare from 17 million Americans.
@housedemocrats.bsky.social aren't giving up. @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social is holding the floor and reminding Republicans how horrible this bill is:
Republicans are pushing a cruel bill that would take healthcare from 17 million Americans. I’m fighting back with everything I’ve got, and so are @housedemocrats.bsky.social. We’re using every procedural move possible to stop this disaster from becoming law.
Republicans are pushing a cruel bill that would take healthcare from 17 million Americans. I’m fighting back with everything I’ve got, and so are @HouseDemocrats. We’re using every procedural move possible to stop this disaster from becoming law.
9/ I’m voting NO because South Jersey deserves better. Better health care, better support, and a government that works for them, not against them.
8/ This bill doesn’t solve problems—it creates them. It raises costs for people who are already struggling and pulls the rug out from under those who’ve worked hard for benefits they earned.
7/ On top of that, the bill cuts Pell Grants for nearly 14,000 students in South Jersey. That means fewer chances for young people in working families to afford college and build a better future.
6/ Veterans and their families, who rely on food assistance and healthcare, could face significant cuts.
The bill cuts SNAP, which provides essential nutrition support to thousands of veterans. Cutting these benefits means more empty fridges in households that served our country.
5/ SNAP also supports local jobs—more than 700 in South Jersey alone. When families lose benefits, our grocery stores, truck drivers, and food producers all take a hit.
4/ Working families would feel the pain in every corner of their lives. Over 32,000 households in South Jersey rely on SNAP to help feed their kids. Those benefits are at risk, even though many recipients are already working.
3/ The bill will cause healthcare costs to skyrocket for our neighbors already struggling to put food on the table.
A 60-year-old couple earning $85,000 a year would see their premiums go up by more than $15,000 annually. That’s a 217% increase for the same coverage.
2/ In South Jersey, 16,000 seniors rely on Medicaid for things like home care, prescriptions, and doctor visits. This bill puts that coverage in jeopardy and makes it harder for older Americans to age with dignity.
The Republican budget bill passed the Senate and is heading to the House, where I will be voting NO. This bill is an attack on veterans, seniors, and working families and will cause harm to South Jersey. Here is how: 🧵⬇️
59 years ago, the Civil Rights Act became law, ending legal segregation & outlawing discrimination. This landmark victory was thanks to leaders like John Lewis and countless others. Their work reminds us that the fight for equality and justice isn't over, and we still have work to do.
Welcome to the region, @phillywnba.bsky.social! Excited to see the growth of women's sports in our own backyard. Best fan base in the nation!
How can Republicans turn their back on the very people they were elected to serve? Stripping healthcare from seniors, veterans, and working families is reprehensible.
Today, USAID closes its doors, ending decades of lifesaving work that supported families worldwide. I saw the impact firsthand during my trip to Kenya. This is a shortsighted mistake that betrays America's global leadership, national security, and democratic values.
thehill.com/policy/inter...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 11 / 11