Donald Norcross headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New Jersey District 1
Born
December 13, 1958
Age 67
Phone
(202) 225-6501
Office
2427 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Jersey District 1

Donald Norcross

Donald W. Norcross is an American politician and labor leader who is the U.S. representative for New Jersey's 1st congressional district in South Jersey. A member of the Democratic Party, Norcross was first elected to this congressional seat in 2014, following the resignation of Rob Andrews. His district covers much of the New Jersey side of the Philadelphia metro area, including Camden, Cherry Hill, Lindenwold, and Glassboro.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 534
Yes35%
No48%
Present0%
Not Voting17%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Donald Norcross headshot
Donald Norcross
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Jersey District 1
SoupScore
Donald's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 67 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This is disgraceful. Our veterans have served our country honorably and deserve access to quality healthcare. When they put their lives on the line for our families, they didn’t care about your political party or whether you were married; they fought for all Americans.
No one should fear assault for asking questions, especially not a U.S. senator doing his job. This unacceptable breach of congressional authority threatens the separation of powers and sets a dangerous precedent.
Thirteen years ago today, President Obama created DACA, giving young immigrants the chance to live and work without fear. Dreamers are our neighbors, coworkers, and friends. We must protect programs like DACA as the Trump Administration attacks our immigrant community.
I’m heartbroken and shocked by the attack on Minnesota State Senator John Hoffman, State Rep. Melissa Hortman, and their spouses. Violence has no place in America. We must stand united against hate. My thoughts are with them and their loved ones during this tragic time.
It takes a wide range of jobs to keep our country running. But, for over 50 years, the narrative for our students has been that you have to go to college to make it in America. It’s time to change the conversation and prepare our students for the demands of the workforce. Read more on @thehill.com
If signed into law, the Trump-Republican recession package would take away food from hungry kids, make it easier for infectious diseases to spread, neglect Americans' safety, & cut kids' access to educational TV shows. It's a reckless bill that puts billionaires first, & working families last. (7/7)
Cutting PBS funding would hurt families who rely on public TV & radio to support their children’s education & stay informed about the news of the day. Trump & Republicans are making it harder for kids to access educational TV that many of us grew up with and learned from, like Sesame Street. (6/7)
It's heartbreaking that Trump and House Republicans want to cut funding for a program that feeds starving kids in Africa. No child, no matter where he or she is born, should have to worry about where their next meal is coming from. (5/7)
Trump and House Republicans claim to care about national security yet they want to cut a program that monitors nuclear and chemical weapons in Iran. Cutting waste, fraud, and abuse should never be at the expense of American safety. (4/7)
The package would end funding for the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), a program that provides humanitarian aid to children in developing nations. All children deserve basic human rights like access to clean water, vaccines, and education. UNICEF keeps kids alive and gives them a chance to thrive. (3/7)
The Trump-Republican rescissions package would cut programs to fight diseases like AIDS, polio, malaria, and Tuberculosis around the globe. Not only do these programs help people in need, but they also prevent infectious diseases from spreading into the U.S. (2/7)
Trump gave Elon Musk free rein to dismantle essential government services to pay for tax cuts for billionaires. Now, House Republicans are working to make DOGE’s cuts permanent by enshrining them into law. Here's how ⬇️🧵 (1/7)
On this day in 1967, the Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. Virginia declared state laws that prohibited interracial marriage unconstitutional. I will continue to fight to end discrimination in all forms
If you can fill a prescription for opioids at a pharmacy, you should be able to fill one for treatment. My Modernizing Opioid Treatment Access Act would expand methadone access, cut red tape, and put patients over profits. It’s time we modernize care and save lives.
The Job Corps helps nearly 20,000 of our nation's young adults train for in-demand jobs in industries like manufacturing and shipbuilding. We should be investing in our youth, not pulling the rug out from under them.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
534 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 11Next →