Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 14
Born
October 13, 1989
Age 36
Phone
(202) 225-3965
Office
250 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 14

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, also known by her initials AOC, is an American politician and activist who has served since 2019 as the U.S. representative for New York's 14th congressional district. She is a member of the Democratic Party.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 496
Yes37%
No59%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 14

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez headshot
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 14
SoupScore
Alexandria's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 7 sponsored · 117 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

AOC on possibly running for the Senate or President: They assume my ambition is a title or a seat. My ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country. Presidents come and go, elected officials come and go, single payer healthcare is forever.
Here is @aoc.bsky.social thankfully telling everyone exactly what to do to stop a concentration camp from being built where you live. Please take it to heart and take action.
Local zoning is the way! A lot of these are being stopped or stalled by neighborhood organizing. These warehouses often need to be purchased, permitted, approved for occupancy and specs. Each one of those steps can be interrupted. Ppl are pressuring corps not to sell, counties to deny permits, etc
It’s not to say all critiques are bad, but some people approach it more as a realm of one-way personal expression than a space to act, grapple, discuss, support, change, and improve. It helps to be grounded. Are real solutions/alternatives offered? Is the expectation perfect or human? Etc
Sometimes people over-personalize choices and certain critiques can come down to a saviorism view of politics. Imagine a chess board well into a game. Your team has far fewer pieces and you are surrounded, but still in it. Your moves are more limited. You can get mad at that, or change the board.
I believe only the author of the bill can invoke the privilege to trigger a vote. I’m not 100% sure why it hasn’t yet. Could be there’s some leverage going on there while DHS is shut down and negotiations are ongoing, but that’s just me speculating. I’m ready to vote. Keep in mind GOP have majority
I think a LOT have been moved to the abolish position. For those wary, it’s usually rooted in 2 things: 1. The word “abolish” 2. When public sentiment snaps back (as it has before) they do not want to be accused of eliminating all enforcement I try to speak to both these points and it’s helpful.
I’ve thought about some form of this. I also communicate in a variety of mediums and have tried to think of a way to share it all in one place, or if that is even necessary in the first place
Local zoning is the way! A lot of these are being stopped or stalled by neighborhood organizing. These warehouses often need to be purchased, permitted, approved for occupancy and specs. Each one of those steps can be interrupted. Ppl are pressuring corps not to sell, counties to deny permits, etc
I also appreciated my conversations with SPD members that see the moment & are pushing for evolution and change. Their position is not easy. No one faction alone can do it & everyone has a role to play. Made me curious about the upside of more precise, cross factional but values based relationships
I appreciated how De Linke has bona fide economists, supported experts, and political leaders to articulate how to enact their prescriptions in the complexities of the real world and markets. People can agree or not but it’s more grounded than a lot of internet-based political culture and grievances
I was encouraged by how strongly the sentiment was shared that the right must be defeated. There are real and justified grievances, not to be brushed aside. But the shared sentiment was real. I did not get the same punitive vibe that some have in the US about wanting the right to win out of spite
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
496 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-20H.R. 1223 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-20H. Res. 426 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1286 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-19H.R. 1263 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2240 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-15H.R. 2255 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 352 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2243 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-14H. Res. 405 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-14H.R. 2215 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H.R. 249 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-13H. Con. Res. 30 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-08H.R. 276 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-07H.R. 881 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-07H.R. 1503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-06H. Res. 377 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 36 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-05-05H.R. 530 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 78 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 859 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1442 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H.R. 1402 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-04-29H. Res. 354 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-04-28S. 146 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-28H.R. 973 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 22 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-04-10H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1228 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-04-10H.R. 1526 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-04-09H.R. 1526 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 10Next →