WATCH: "This country was founded on a rejection of kings, and my view is that the American people have no interest in this new experiment in monarchy that this president is trying to impose. I think that it is deeper than political party."
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Georgia
Jon Ossoff
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes31%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align96%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jon Ossoff
U.S. SenatorDemocratGeorgia
SoupScore
Jon's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 84 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Sen. Ossoff: "The erosion of civil rights and civil liberties in this country right now is happening at so swift a rate, it is unlike anything we've seen in American history."
"The depth of depravity and horror of the Holocaust must be known universally and forever, and we can't take for granted that it will be remembered, particularly at a time when we see growing efforts to deny it," Sen. Ossoff said.
For the 4th year in a row, Sen. Ossoff joined Georgia's Jewish community at the annual community-wide Yom HaShoah commemoration at Greenwood Cemetery to hear powerful stories from Holocaust survivors.
WATCH: Sen. Ossoff at this year's Military Service Academy Day for Georgia's high school students interested in attending U.S. Service Academies.
This weekend, alongside Dobbins ARB, @hankjohnson.house.gov, & Georgia's Congressional delegation, Sen. Ossoff hosted Military Service Academy Day, where Georgia high school students & their families learned more about the application & nomination process for the five U.S. Service Academies.
NEW REPORT: Georgia doctors are being forced to wait for women to develop life-threatening infections before terminating nonviable pregnancies due to the State of Georgia’s abortion ban.
www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2025/04/23/s...
Have YOU been impacted by large, out of state companies buying up Georgia homes and driving up home prices?
If so, Sen. Ossoff wants to hear from you. Share your story with our office today: ossoff.senate.gov/homestory
NEW: After the Trump Administration stripped children in immigration courts of lawyers, Sens. Ossoff and Murkowski
are leading a bipartisan demand that the Administration reverse course and ensure children have representation.
Read more: www.npr.org/2025/04/15/g...
Georgia Service Academy Day is coming up on Saturday, April 26. Sen. Ossoff invites high school students and their families to learn more about the application and congressional nomination process for the 5 U.S. Service Academies.
RSVP BY THIS FRIDAY: www.ossoff.senate.gov/academyday/
WATCH: Senate Republicans just *blocked* Sen. Ossoff’s amendment to reverse cuts to the Social Security Administration ordered by Elon Musk.
Sen. Ossoff Condemns Trump Administration’s Continued Attacks on CDC
Sen. Ossoff Statement on Loss of Georgia Servicemembers in Lithuania
NEWS: Sen. Ossoff & @warnock.senate.gov, alongside U.S. Representatives Austin Scott (GA-08) and Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. (GA-02), today reintroduced their bipartisan legislation to establish Georgia’s first National Park and Preserve.
WATCH: Sen. Ossoff’s full questioning of Trump Administration officials on the recent signal chat scandal.
Sen. Ossoff: "Director Ratcliffe, this was a huge mistake, correct?"
Director Ratcliffe: "No."
WATCH: "Laws like Georgia's do not protect women. They endanger us. They force us to suffer needlessly, to scramble for care across state lines, to endure financial and emotional burdens on top of medical crisis." - Callie Beale Harper
WATCH: Sen. Ossoff today convened an oversight session where Georgia women spoke out on their near-death experiences under Georgia abortion ban restrictions, including Avery Davis Bell.
"I needed to be actively dying to receive a life-saving abortion," Davis Bell said.
WATCH: For thousands of retired public workers, like Vickie Richeson in Hephzibah, Georgia, the Social Security Fairness Act that Sen. Ossoff helped pass into law will increase retirement benefits and help ensure they get the Social Security benefits they've earned.
youtube.com/shorts/3TIPi...
NEWS: Sen. Ossoff introduced a bipartisan bill to help Georgia’s first responders and teachers buy homes in the communities they serve.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.