WATCH: Sen. Ossoff presses President Trump's Interior Secretary to protect the Okefenokee Swamp.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Georgia
Jon Ossoff
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 828
Yes31%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align96%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jon Ossoff
U.S. SenatorDemocratGeorgia
SoupScore
Jon's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 78 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Esther Graff-Radford, who represents tenants across Georgia: “If they wanted a house with a yard in the right school district, they were forced to rent from one of these big out-of-state rental companies. As landlords, these companies prioritize profit over my clients' safety.”
Sen. Ossoff: “We’ve heard from Georgians who have tried for months and even years to have their heating, stoves, plumbing, or fallen ceilings repaired.”
Today, Sen. Ossoff hosted friends from the National Council of Jewish Women @NCJW Atlanta who were in Washington advocating for Georgia women, children, and families.
Shana Brooks-Wilhite, a disabled U.S. Navy veteran in Stockbridge, Georgia, on out-of-state corporate landlords: “We’re not humans to them. We’re dollar signs.”
WATCH: Shana Brooks-Wilhite, a disabled U.S. Navy veteran in Stockbridge, Georgia, describes being unable to get help from her large, out-of-state corporate landlord after a dangerous gas leak in her rental home.
WATCH: Patrick Colson-Price from Smyrna, Georgia, describes finding hundreds of pieces of glass in his yard but being unable to get help from his out-of-state corporate landlord.
WATCH: Sen. Ossoff today held an oversight session to hear testimony from Georgians as part of his ongoing investigation into large, out-of-state companies buying up single-family homes in Georgia.
Reposted byOssoff's Office
"That's how mistakes are made." Senator Jon Ossoff talks with Jen Psaki about the chilling consequences within the intelligence community of Tulsi Gabbard firing intelligence officials whose conclusions did not align with Donald Trump's political narrative.
WATCH: Sen. Ossoff on reports that the Trump Administration fired intelligence officials because their analysis contradicted President Trump.
"The depth of corruption and self-dealing and self-enrichment by the Trump family during this term is something that we have never ever seen in the United States." -Sen. Ossoff on @briefingwithpsaki.bsky.social
This week, Sen. Ossoff met with Georgia pecan growers to discuss their work expanding market access for Georgia pecans around the world. In 2023, alongside Georgia growers, Sen. Ossoff helped negotiate a 70% reduction in India’s tariffs on pecan imports.
Sen. Ossoff is urging the Trump Administration to ensure VA mass firings don’t lengthen wait times for Georgia veterans.
Read more here: www.walb.com/2025/05/09/o...
WATCH: Sen. Ossoff is investigating large, out-of-state companies who are buying up single-family homes to get answers for Georgia families struggling to afford rent and homeownership.
NEW: Sen. Ossoff is investigating large, out-of-state companies buying up Georgia homes and driving up home prices.
Have you been impacted? Share your story today: ossoff.senate.gov/homestory
WATCH: Last week, Sen. Ossoff introduced bipartisan legislation to help secure justice for civil rights cold case victims and their families.
"There’s no expiration date on justice. That’s why this effort must continue,” Sen. Ossoff said.
NEWS: Sen. Ossoff introduced the bipartisan Improving SCRA Benefit Utilization Act to expand financial protections and benefits available to active duty servicemembers and their families.
"Do not forget your power as citizens. In this country, the power is still with the people." -Sen. Ossoff
Sen. Ossoff: Who out there in the American public is sitting at home demanding that we shut down cancer research and Alzheimer's research?
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History828 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
828 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17