The Presidio is one of our country’s most cherished spaces—& is a model of a public-private partnership that saves the government money.
The Trump Administration's move against the Presidio Trust is wrong, & I stand ready to fight this reckless Executive Order.
www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/p...

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|California
Alex Padilla
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes25%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Alex Padilla
U.S. SenatorDemocratCalifornia
SoupScore
Alex's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 89 sponsored · 399 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Republicans are taking an axe to your housing, health care, and education, all to give tax cuts to billionaires.
They are literally stealing from the poor to give to the rich.
Kash Patel has repeatedly proven that his loyalty isn’t to the American people or the rule of law—it’s to Donald Trump.
Migrants are being deported to countries they aren't from.
Families swept up in raids and children denied lawyers.
Immigrants with no criminal convictions sent to Guantanamo Bay.
Trump's anti-immigrant agenda of chaos and cruelty is on full display.
Absolutely heartbreaking.
No one––especially a child––deserves to face this much cruelty over their family’s immigration status.
My thoughts are with Jocelyn's family during this unimaginable time. www.latintimes.com/11-year-old-...
It’s especially important in times like these to push and fight back in any way possible.
I'm calling on Senate Republicans to stand up and protect their own constituents––even if it means standing up to Trump.
By gutting the CFPB, Donald Trump and shadow president Elon Musk are sending a clear message: they’re taking the side of big banks, scammers, and Wall Street executives over American consumers.
I'm calling on the Trump Admin to remove Musk's operatives and restore the CFPB.
RFK Jr. has lied, backpedaled, and spread conspiracy theories to get where he is today.
He’s more loyal to Trump than he is to the American people––and Americans will be less healthy because of him.
I am voting NO on his nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
By nominating Tulsi Gabbard to be the Director of National Intelligence, Trump is putting our national security at risk.
I am voting NO on Tulsi Gabbard's nomination because America's top intelligence official shouldn't be a sympathizer to our foreign adversaries.
To the millions of people whose personal information was stolen by Elon and DOGE––I’m getting to the bottom of this and demanding answers from the Department of Education.
We’re not letting Elon get away with stealing your private data.
As fire season approaches, thousands of additional firefighters are typically hired for seasonal crews.
Now Trump’s reckless hiring freeze is a putting lives, homes, and entire communities at risk. amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/02/...
Unelected billionaire Elon Musk is going after YOUR retirement benefits.
Social Security and Medicare are at risk because the richest man in the world wants a tax break. www.semafor.com/article/02/0...
This week, Californians have come out in droves to oppose Russell Vought’s nomination.
They are demanding that the services they rely on be protected, and they are refusing to let Vought pillage essential programs so that the billionaires can get a bigger tax break.
Trump has now handed shadow President Elon Musk control of your Social Security payments and Medicare benefits. The government programs that you paid into to help you in retirement, the retirement that you earned.
$300 million––that's how much Elon paid in campaign contributions to buy his way into the federal government and gain access to your personal data and taxpayer dollars.
Last I checked, that's not how a democracy works.
Pam Bondi is either unwilling or unable to put her duty to the American people above her loyalty to Donald Trump.
Under a President with complete disregard for the rule of law, that is a risk we cannot afford in our Attorney General.
Today kicks off #BlackHistoryMonth –– a time to honor the history, resilience, and contributions of Black Americans.
As we celebrate, let’s also recommit to building a more just and inclusive future for all!
Trump just confirmed that he will impose a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico, and a 10% tariff on China, effective TOMORROW.
Trump and his billionaire backers can afford higher groceries and prices at the gas pump.
Can you? www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-t...
🐉🧧Happy Lunar Year to everyone celebrating in California!
May the year of the snake, grant you renewal, transformation, and wisdom.
Let me get this straight––Trump wants to take away money from protecting airports, intercepting drug dealers, and stopping cyber criminals, so he can pay for his plan to separate and deport immigrant families? www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-16 | S. Con. Res. 22 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62) |
| 2025-09-16 | S.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2025-09-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2025-09-15 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Resolution S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377 | YES | YES | ✓ | Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-09-11 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-09-10 | S. 2296 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | S. Res. 377 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-09-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-09-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-43) |
| 2025-09-04 | S. 2296 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-09-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-09-02 | S. 2296 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (71-23) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | — | — | Nomination Confirmed (72-22) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-35) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-42) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (78-17) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-08-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.