Here in Maine, we've already seen one rural hospital close this year (Northern Light Inland Hospital in Waterville). Others are barely hanging on—and bracing for the worst.
The broader impacts on our health care system will be huge. (10/13)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Maine District 1
Chellie Pingree
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes40%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chellie Pingree
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMaine District 1
SoupScore
Chellie's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 161 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Then there’s the impact on rural hospitals + community health centers—most of which rely heavily on Medicaid reimbursements.
More uninsured people means more unpaid bills, more financial strain, and a greater risk that the only clinic or hospital for miles will be forced to close its doors. (9/13)
This is *exactly* what Republicans are trying to do on a national scale: Make the process so complicated and burdensome that people just give up and drop out.
That’s their actual plan for weeding out “waste, fraud, and abuse.” (8/13)
Today, fewer than 7,500 Georgians are enrolled in the so-called “Pathways” program, out of ~345,000 who qualify.
That’s a 3% participation rate.
All because of ridiculous paperwork requirements that almost no one can follow—and a whole lot of digital inequity. (7/13)
Back in 2023, Georgia tried implementing the nation’s first-ever work requirement for Medicaid.
You know what happened? People either found the process too onerous, couldn’t access the online portal (because they didn’t have internet), or were kicked off due to paperwork errors. (6/13)
Take the “work requirement” included in the BBBA. This might sound sensible on its face, but there’s virtually no explanation for what it would look like.
Do you have to provide pay stubs? W2s? A signed letter from your employer? All of the above? Nobody knows! (5/13)
Those who don’t? They’re:
🟢 People in low-wage or part-time jobs
🟢 Parents caring for children with disabilities
🟢 People with disabilities or chronic conditions
🟢 Older adults who can’t rely on Medicare alone
Many could have their health care taken away, thanks to a maze of red tape. (4/13)
In fact, a 2023 GAO report estimated that fraud by beneficiaries accounts for <1% of all improper Medicaid payments.
(Side note: the Speaker's claim that 1.4 million undocumented immigrants are on federally funded Medicaid? Totally false.)
Most adults on Medicaid who can work, *do* work! (3/13)
First, we need to dispel the myth that these cuts are about weeding out “waste, fraud, and abuse.”
Believing that the 10 million people who stand to lose Medicaid coverage (according to the nonpartisan CBO) are somehow gaming the system and deserve what’s coming—it’s simply ludicrous. (2/13)
🧵
There are *many* parts of the Big Ugly Bill that are truly appalling.
But the cuts to Medicaid, which could total more than a TRILLION dollars, might be the most devastating. Not only to millions of people who rely on it, but for our entire health care system—and our economy. (1/13)
The path forward is clear: pass the Farm Workforce Modernization Act and deliver the stability farmers have been pleading for.
Farmers have sounded the alarm for years: they need a stable, reliable workforce. And the reality is, immigrant labor is essential.
The absurd suggestion that we can easily fill that workforce gap shows a deep misunderstanding of both farm labor needs and the seriousness of the challenge.
The self-proclaimed “Pro-Family Party” is
*checks notes*
❌ Stripping health care from millions of kids + parents
❌ Slashing SNAP
❌ Gutting climate action that protects our kids’ futures
❌ Driving up costs for families—from student loans to energy bills
There’s nothing “pro-family” about this.
The Administration wants to charge foreign visitors more to enter National Parks like Acadia.
It’s bizarre, discriminatory, and will hurt Maine’s tourism industry—which is already struggling thanks to the President’s policies and trade war with Canada.
Acadia should be open and accessible. Period.
To make matters worse, many experts argue the bill could further jeopardize Social Security’s long-term solvency (and Medicare's).
Just like with “No Tax on Tips,” we can’t let Republicans exaggerate how many people will actually benefit from this so-called “senior bonus.” (5/5)
Cost of living is a big concern for seniors—especially those on fixed incomes. This senior bonus will provide some relief.
But when you consider how SNAP + Medicaid cuts will lead to increased costs for millions—including seniors—it’s worth wondering how impactful this “bonus” will really be. (4/5)
So what’s actually included in the bill? A temporary “senior bonus” of $6,000 per person (or $12,000 per couple), which phases out above an income of $75K (or $150K per couple).
It also expires in 2028.
The tax cuts for billionaires and big corporations? Those are permanent. (3/5)
Throughout his campaign, Trump talked about wanting to eliminate taxes on SS benefits. After the election, he promised to make it one of the pillars of his “Big Beautiful Bill.”
Here’s the thing: 64% of beneficiaries *already* pay no taxes on SS! That’s how low the income is for most people. (2/5)
🧵
Yesterday, I explained how the “No Tax on Tips” provision of Trump’s Big Awful Bill is a lot more complicated—and a lot less beneficial—than people were led to believe.
Today, I thought I’d turn the spotlight on another big promise Republicans made: “No Tax on Social Security.” (1/5)
Big thanks to @jenrubin.bsky.social for having me on again.
This time, we talked about the terrible impacts the Big Ugly Bill will have on hardworking Americans—and the moral bankruptcy of taking food and healthcare from vulnerable people to pad the bank accounts of America’s billionaires.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.