I am a no on the CR agreement. I respect my colleagues on both sides, but the American people don’t deserve a preventable increase in health care costs.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes32%
No67%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 37 sponsored · 157 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Pres. Trump has a choice: Let kids go to bed hungry & seniors undernourished.
Or, instead of fighting court orders, he should listen to the American people, follow their example, and help prevent our neighbors in need from going hungry.
When it comes to health care, people want affordable options & choices that fit their needs. Congress needs to listen to the American people & help save health care!
rhodeislandcurrent.com/2025/11/07/a...
@pelosi.house.gov's strong conviction, steely resolve, & principled leadership helped her achieve an incredible record, from the ACA to Wall Street reform & ARPA. As a trailblazer & dedicated public servant, she has helped make America a better place for all.
Patricia Raub was a titan for community libraries. As a @9librariespvd.bsky.social founder, Patricia brought support & connection to countless RIers.
Her legacy will live on in the communities and libraries she lifted up, loved, & fought for.
We were saddened to learn of the passing of Patricia Raub following a period of illness. Patricia, one of the “Founders” of CLPVD, helped save our neighborhood libraries from closure. We will miss her - and remain forever in her debt. #PVD #LibrarySky https://loom.ly/c68t1FI
Thanks to @fitzprov.bsky.social for having me on @globeri.bsky.social’s #RIReport podcast to discuss my recent speech on the Senate floor warning about Pres. Trump’s dangerous politicization of the U.S. military.
Republicans’ refusal to fix Pres. Trump’s health care crisis means thousands of RIers are at risk of losing health insurance & thousands more will pay double for the same plan they have now.
@democrats.senate.gov have a solution to lower your costs & reopen the gov’t.
Hearing from RIers like Jeff who are facing sticker shock due to Trump’s health care increases & Republican refusal to help lower costs.
Congress must work together to re-open the federal gov’t & save health care.
Open enrollment began this weekend. Pres. Trump & Republicans in Congress still refuse to help lower your health care premiums.
Millions across the nation are in for serious sticker shock. Dems are fighting to lower your costs & keep Americans insured.
The President shouldn’t need a court order just to follow the law or do the right thing.
Now, Trump’s half-baked approach to only provide partial SNAP funding hurts the whole country and underscores Trump’s gross mismanagement.
Proud to team up w/ @whitehouse.senate.gov to support Sojourner House’s tremendous work with a $1 million fed earmark that is connecting survivors of domestic violence and other forms of abuse to safe, healthy places to call home.
Once again, Pres. Trump has it wrong when it comes to nuclear weapons policy.
The U.S. would gain very little from such testing & stands to sacrifice decades of hard-won progress in preventing nuclear proliferation.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...
Happy Halloween! Honored to meet her royal highness Princess Elsa of Arendelle at Hart Halloween. She was absolutely brrrrrilliant and assured me it won’t be too cold for trick or treaters tonight.
BIG NEWS: On a bipartisan vote of 51-47, the U.S. Senate just voted to help reduce prices for Americans and end Trump’s costly and unpopular global tariffs on more than 100 countries.
Now the House must return from its 6-week hiatus, do its job and vote.
Maureen is right – if Republicans get their way, millions of Americans will lose their health insurance. RIers are seeing huge increases for next year & open enrollment starts this weekend. The time to act is now.
The President’s economic policies should work for Americans. Not put Americans out of work.
Pres. Trump’s chaotic tariff tantrums must end.
Pres. Trump’s politicization of the U.S. military could haunt us for generations.
My Republican colleagues must do more than just recognize the problem.
We must take concrete legislative action.
Leigh’s story is not unique, but her willingness to share it and advocate for others is courageous and uncommon.
I will continue working to save health care for people like Leigh & all RIers who need access to affordable coverage.
Trump Admin has the funds & authority needed to extend SNAP. But it’s choosing to suspend benefits. Is it because of:
A) Weakness
B) POTUS left the country for a week & staff uncertainty
C) Trump thinks SNAP recipients are lazy & wants to punish them
❌ All of the above
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 89 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 87 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 88 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.