Jack Reed headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Rhode Island
Born
1949
Age 77
Phone
(202) 224-4642
Office
728 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island

Jack Reed

John Francis Reed is an American lawyer and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Rhode Island, a seat he was first elected to in 1996. A member of the Democratic Party, he was the U.S. representative for Rhode Island's 2nd congressional district from 1991 to 1997. Reed graduated from the United States Military Academy and Harvard University, serving in the U.S. Army as an active officer from 1971 to 1979. He is the dean of Rhode Island's congressional delegation since 1999 upon the death of John Chafee.

Voting Record — 830
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jack Reed headshot
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 165 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans just voted AGAINST a bill Democrats wrote to fund the government and also fix the GOP health care crisis. Now Republicans are LEAVING TOWN instead of working with us to lower health care costs and stop hospitals from closing. Make sure everyone knows it.
Regular Americans are struggling to afford health care, housing, and groceries & Pres. Trump’s economy favors the ultra-wealthy. It’s way past time for billionaires to pay their fair share. Our tax system is skewed to benefit the wealthy & it must be fixed.
NSF research investments boost economic development & attract top research talent to RI. Met with PVD-based @amermathsoc.bsky.social to discuss how NSF funding, like recent $16.5M for Institute for Computational & Experimental Research in Mathematics, helps unlock discoveries & solutions.
Happy Birthday, U.S. Air Force! Forever grateful to the dedicated men & women of the U.S. Air Force who selflessly defend our nation & maintain U.S. air superiority. Thank you for your service!
RFK Jr’s anti-vaccine actions are unsupported by scientific facts & endanger public health. Kennedy’s efforts to undermine childhood vaccinations could lead to more infections, more hospitalizations, & more preventable deaths.
I fight for increased federal research funding each year & wrote the law that boosted childhood cancer research. Pres. Trump signed it during his first term. Right now, we’re losing our progress. This Admin’s attacks on science must end.
About 175,000 RIers are expected to see their health care premiums rise by double digits next year. I’ve got a plan to help reign in these runaway price hikes, but Trump & MAGA Republicans don’t even want to negotiate on this. Regular people deserve better from the President.
The power to declare war belongs to Congress, not the president. These egregious killings are illegal and risk dragging America into war with Venezuela. Congress must hold President Trump accountable and stop this reckless abuse of power before it’s too late. www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-s...
Higher health care premiums are expected next year because Pres. Trump’s so-called Big Beautiful Bill put billionaires over working families. Congressional Republicans must come to the table to lower health care costs & help Americans keep the peace of mind of being insured.
Honored to meet former crew and family members of the USS Leonard F. Mason (DD-852). Hope you enjoy reunion with fellow shipmates & loved ones & your visit to the Ocean State!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
830 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 17 / 17