The more Americans learn about Trump’s Big Ugly Bill, the more they hate it.
We’re forcing GOP to read the bill in its entirety, so Americans get the facts.
You can tune in to @c-span.bsky.social now to see this bill exposed for what it is:
A giveaway to special interests at your expense.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes32%
No67%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 37 sponsored · 159 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
I know damn well the Republicans haven't read this bill.
So, we’re going to make them.
Republicans voted to advance a shameful 1,000 page bill to explode the national debt & rip away Medicaid from millions of Americans in order to give bigger tax windfalls to billionaires. We're making them read every word of this unpopular bill on the Senate floor. Starting now.
We need responsible, forward-looking investments in America’s future. Instead, the Trump-Republican budget gives handouts to old-money interests & outdated industries at the expense of everyday Americans. That’s not gonna lower prices, nor will it help America outcompete others.
BREAKING: Trump-Republicans forced to give up plot to sell off hundreds of thousands of acres of public lands to wealthy developers so they could keep people out. The Big Ugly Betrayal bill is still big & ugly, but this is a win for the public!
thehill.com/policy/energ...
If Trump and Republicans are really eliminating fraud and abuse in Medicaid why not invest the savings back into the program to improve health care for those still in it instead of blowing it on billionaire tax cuts?
The big, shameful Republican budget would make health insurance more expensive, bureaucratic, & difficult to obtain. People without insurance will still get sick & hospitals will have to treat them in emergency rooms. This bill is a prescription for higher health costs for all.
Being able to afford health care & food is important. Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill would make both more expensive & force future generations to pick up the tab.
Glad to see fed court continue to put the brakes on the Trump Admin’s illegal attempt to shutter the Job Corps program. The fight is far from over. We’re continuing bipartisan effort to #SaveJobCorps & preserve opportunities for all.
AI is rapidly evolving & regulations must evolve with it to keep pace.
The Republican budget bill would strip states of their right to regulate AI at the state level and protect their citizens from the misuse of artificial intelligence.
This GOP provision should be stripped.
The Trump Administration is unwise to prematurely insist Iran’s nuclear program was “obliterated” without clear evidence.
This exaggerated claim is unnecessary and could weaken our future credibility and leverage against Iran.
Americans deserve facts, not bluster.
The Republican budget would rip affordable health coverage from millions & trigger enormous cuts to Medicaid, restricting people’s access to affordable health assistance when they need it most.
I created the CFPB's Office of Servicemember Affairs to shield our troops from fraud & go after scammers that targeted military families. The Trump Admin. is abandoning this post & leaving U.S. forces & veterans more vulnerable to exploitation.
Trump Admin is failing to stop hundreds of thousands of U.S. firearms smuggled into Mexico in vehicles each year. That fuels crime & drug trade. AG Bondi saying "our borders are closed” doesn’t cut it. It’s time for the AG & Trump to actually stop gun trafficking.
The cyber threat from Iran & affiliated hackers is rising. We must strengthen U.S. cyber defenses, but the Trump Admin is cutting cyber staff & budgets. The Trump Admin should reverse course, rehire cyber talent, & put American security first.
We need to get machineguns out of the hands of criminals. Instead, the Trump Admin walked away from a ban on 'forced-reset triggers,' which increase the killing force of semi-automatic rifles. This puts profits over people & increases likelihood of mass-shootings.
Before kicking 16 million Americans off their health insurance to give massive tax breaks to billionaires, Republicans should consult with their doctors.
Across the U.S., health care workers are warning about disastrous consequences of Trump’s so-called Big Beautiful Bill.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16