Leading scientists & researchers in RI have made it clear: NIH-funded research fuels our economy & strengthens public health. Joined my colleagues in the delegation to get answers on Trump Admin’s disastrous planned NIH cuts.
rhodeislandcurrent.com/briefs/r-i-c...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes32%
No67%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 37 sponsored · 159 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump said he trusts Putin.
Putin is a violent, dictatorial autocrat who invaded Ukraine’s sovereign territory to fulfill his dream of recreating the Soviet Empire.
The U.S. cannot appease him.
youtube.com/shorts/NRcnD...
Slashing staff at the Social Security Admin & field offices by 50% will hurt retirees.
Trump Admin’s irresponsible proposal means seniors who earned their benefits can’t rely on someone picking up the phone to help.
AI chat bots can’t replace in-person visits & 1-on-1 help.
Egg prices are skyrocketing, and Trump is making it worse — instead of putting resources toward fixing it, he fired USDA staff working to combat avian flu.
Trump’s sham energy emergency does nothing to lower prices or create good-paying jobs.
youtube.com/shorts/6MwVY...
Rallying support for NOAA because Americans & our communities rely on its research, surveys, programs, and services to stay safe, productive, & resilient. youtube.com/shorts/UMqCb...
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Secretary of Defense Hegseth says he doesn’t know if Russia invaded Ukraine.
This you?
Teaming up w/ Sen. Durbin on the Crypto ATM Fraud Prevention Act. Help us fight crypto ATM scams:
1. Educate yourself & loved ones to spot signs of crypto scams
2. Question unusual requests related to crypto payments
3. Report scams to your local law enforcement agency &
FTC
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Couldn't agree more with Senator Reed. Firing our nation's most skilled and experienced military leaders will undermine our military readiness.
Our armed forces only owe their allegiance to supporting and defending the Constitution of the United States — not the President.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Trump and House Republicans are trying to SLASH MEDICAID.
HURTING kids, seniors, veterans, working people.
And all to pay for tax giveaways for their BILLIONAIRES’ CLUB.
Democrats are fighting it tooth and nail.
youtube.com/shorts/b3njt...
I helped create protections for servicemembers through the CFPB to shield our military & their families from predatory lending schemes & other fraudulent practices.
It’s unacceptable these protections are being thrown out so Trump and Republicans can give billionaires more tax cuts.
Had a great chat w/ my buddy Jon Tester & @maritsageorgiou.bsky.social on their new podcast, Grounded. We discussed security, justice, what it means to serve & more.
Musk’s mass-firing squad can’t shoot straight. Another example of how instead of uncovering waste, they are wasting taxpayer money.
apnews.com/article/fda-...
Dedicated & highly trained civilian personnel contribute to & serve the U.S. military in so many important ways.
Special congrats to Bristol resident and U.S. Navy clinical & child psychologist Dr. Matthew Picerno on being honored as the 2024 U.S. Navy Senior Civilian of the Year.
Public education strengthens communities & our nation. If you’re reading this, it means you benefited in some way, shape or form from public schools.
Happy Public Schools Week! #PublicSchoolsWeek
Trump’s unlawful funding freeze & mass layoffs hurt RI farmers and leave struggling families with not enough to eat.
www.providencejournal.com/story/news/p...
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
While others seek to deny #BlackHistoryMonth and weaponize the ideas of diversity, equity, and inclusion — I joined @reed.senate.gov at Mixed Magic Theatre in Pawtucket to discuss how art supports and advances our collective freedom.
Joined NPR’s Morning Edition this morning to discuss the latest from the Pentagon.
www.npr.org/2025/02/24/n...
RI has lost a legal legend, Judge Bruce Selya, 90, whose outstanding contributions to the community & people of RI go well beyond his four decades of remarkable service on the federal bench.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.