Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Rhode Island
Jack Reed
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes32%
No67%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jack Reed
U.S. SenatorDemocratRhode Island
SoupScore
Jack's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 37 sponsored · 159 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Here with @amo.house.gov & Mixed Magic Theatre in Pawtucket to celebrate #BlackHistoryMonth & the power of the arts by highlighting tremendous contributions of Black Americans to our nation and state’s culture, art, & heritage.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Senator @reed.senate.gov blasts Senate Republicans for advancing a reconciliation budget bill "that lays the groundwork to give massive tax windfalls to billionaires at the expense of everyday Americans."
Tax cuts for billionaires won’t bring costs down.
www.youtube.com/shorts/kPByL...
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
All night on the Senate floor:
Democrats are putting up AMENDMENT AFTER AMENDMENT to fight back against the Senate Republican budget resolution
Because the Republicans, Donald Trump, and Elon Musk are trying to give huge tax breaks to their billionaire buddies paid for by YOU
Care about children and want them to have a chance at a healthy life as good citizens? Then you should join me in opposing Republican plans to whack Medicaid.
youtube.com/shorts/Hzk41...
22 years after the Station Nightclub fire and our hearts still mourn for friends, family, and loved ones we lost.
We will never forget those who perished or were injured, the brave first responders who rushed to help, and those who have made a positive difference in their honor.
Trump’s irresponsible economic policies are pushing the U.S. economy down the wrong track. Instead of helping to lower prices, he’s pushing us to stagflation.
Trump's contempt for the rule of law and America’s allies only deters investment.
It took less than 24 hours for Pres. Trump to flip from saying he won’t touch Medicaid/Medicare to fully endorsing House GOP plans to cut them, jeopardizing health care for millions of Americans.
www.nytimes.com/2025/02/19/u...
For 3 yrs, Ukraine has fought heroically against Vladimir Putin’s invasion. It seems Pres. Trump couldn't last three weeks.
Trump appears weak right now, but it's not too late to change course, reject Putin, & show America’s strength by standing with Ukraine & NATO.
www.politico.eu/article/dona...
If Trump & Musk want to fight fraud & waste, they should start with the Carried Interest loophole.
For too long, Wall Street elites have taken advantage of this loophole to pay less than their fair share.
Introduced a bill with @baldwin.senate.gov to say: No special tax breaks for the wealthy.
Trump's failure to erect guardrails for DOGE, Musk's total lack of accountability, and their reckless assault on constitutional order & Americans’ privacy will come back to haunt them.
Unfortunately, it’s U.S. taxpayers who will be stuck paying to clean up the Trump-Musk mess.
Cutting waste is important. What Trump & Musk are doing creates more waste.
Firing nuclear security agents & re-hiring them. Slashing researchers tracking bird flu. Posting misleading Social Security data to create outrage & threaten benefits.
All of this hurts U.S. taxpayers.
Mr. Cunha is an outstanding public servant. His record, integrity, and commitment to justice is unwavering and speaks for itself.
www.providencejournal.com/story/news/p...
There should be an FAA hiring push right now, not a mass-firing purge. FAA staffing shortages can be detrimental to air travel & operations. Understaffing in control towers leads to more planes on the ground & flight delays. Trump & Musk must strengthen, not weaken the FAA.
Standing w/ RI teachers, advocates, & education leaders to call out Trump’s plan to demolish the U.S. Department of Education. Declaring war on public education won’t help students succeed. Our students, teachers & schools shouldn’t have to pay for Republican tax cuts to billionaires & big business.
Reposted byU.S. Senator Jack Reed
Ukraine has not received an invite to U.S.-Russia peace talks in Saudi Arabia. Sen. @reed.senate.gov calls the move “horrific for the Ukrainian people” and a repeat of Trump’s actions with Afghanistan.
NIH-funded research has proven track record of fueling economic growth & discovery.
Joined RI health care leaders to push back against Trump Admin’s proposed NIH cuts that would put jobs at risk, harm the economy, and needlessly delay scientific breakthroughs & new life-saving treatments.
Impressed by the tremendous teachers, staff, & kids at Tri-County CAA’s Head Start program.
This critical program gives children tools they need to be healthy & successful.
I’m fighting to protect funding that helps make sure teachers & families have what they need to succeed.
Trump’s tariff threats & other misguided policies are raising costs for consumers & squeezing small biz.
Prices for:
Flowers 🔺
Chocolate 🔺
Dinner date 🔺
Have all risen since Trump took office.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair H.R. 1 | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file) | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-28 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-06-27 | S.J. Res. 59 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-40) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.