22+ hours in ⏰
One highlight I want to share with you.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 25
Raul Ruiz
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes45%
No53%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 25
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Raul Ruiz
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 25
SoupScore
Raul's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 76 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
20 hours in… ⏰
In need of a shower.
It’s 4:05 AM, and we’re hearing over and over from Republicans that this bill will not cut benefits. Not true.
When you legislate, you have got to look at the big picture!
It’s late. We’re tired. But we’re still here - standing strong, pushing back, and fighting like hell for your health care.
@energycommerce.bsky.social
Family first!
Republicans are claiming that this reconciliation bill will cut waste, fraud, and abuse. @repjeffries and I are calling bullsh*t.
Victoria Lara is just one example of the millions of people who will be harmed by these atrocious Medicaid cuts. If House Republicans cared about their constituents and not their billionaire buddies, they would have already scrapped this dumpster fire of a bill.
Physicians are fighting for health care today! @drsforamerica.bsky.social
Hour 3... Going on 4 ⏰
Our hospitals do not have the funding now, and cutting Medicaid would be catastrophic.
2 hours in ⏰
Here’s my update, joined by Doctor Trivedi of National Physicians Alliance.
Republicans claim they’re only cutting waste, fraud, and abuse.
I call bullshit — they’re gutting Medicaid for over 13 million people.
We’ve begun, stay tuned for more updates…
Today’s the day. Republicans just dropped their bill to gut your health care, and they’re trying to pass it tonight while you sleep. I’ll be in committee late, fighting to protect Medicaid.
🔔 Follow along here & on Instagram/Facebook Stories. Remember to turn on post notifs. Let’s give them hell.
I’m proud to be a member of the newly formed and bipartisan Public Lands Caucus. Our communities are rooted in natural beauty, and when we protect our #PublicLands, we’re also safeguarding our health, our environment, our culture, and our future.
I celebrated yet another year of the Congressional Art Competition in #CA25. These high school students’ artistic talents continue to inspire and surprise me. Congrats to Cassandra De La Rosa from San Jacinto HS for winning 1st Place.
I can’t wait to see her artwork hung in our nation’s capitol!
Reposted byCongressman Raul Ruiz, MD
Thank you @repraulruizmd.bsky.social for hosting the Steering & Policy Committee town hall in the Coachella Valley - our FIRST (of many) on-the-road events to talk directly with Americans.
I visited #FINDFoodBank to better understand how cuts to USDA funding directly impacts the constituents of #CA25.
SNAP benefits will decrease, resulting in less food for families who need it most. Thank you to FIND Food Bank for serving our region.
These proposed Republican cuts are so unpopular, they had to postpone releasing their legislation this week. We're keeping up the drumbeat b/c every American, no matter their zip code, deserves access to affordable, life-saving care.
The Democratic Doctors in Congress & I say: hands off Medicaid.
Reposted byCongressman Raul Ruiz, MD
🚨 Members of Congress have launched the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to stop the public lands sell-off.
Public lands belong to the American people, not to polluting corporations.
Thank you @debbiedingell.house.gov @repraulruizmd.bsky.social and @repgabevasquez.bsky.social for your leadership! 👏
Reposted byCongressman Raul Ruiz, MD
Happy National Pet Week from New Dems and their furry friends!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-15 | H.J. Res. 117 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3486 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-11 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Instruct negotiators | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.