Companies are raising prices because of Trump’s tariff tax and it’s hurting families.
And what does Trump say about it?
“Eat the tariffs.”
Maybe it’s hard for Trump to hear everyone's concerns from inside his luxury Qatari jet.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York
Charles E. Schumer
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 150 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This is disgusting
The Trump admin is disrespecting the Capitol Police by awarding $5 MILLION to the family of Ashley Babbitt
AN INSURRECTIONIST
This sends a sickening message to police and first responders
When it matters most, Trump will turn his back on you
Trump taking this Qatari plane is a national security threat and a bribe.
And I’m introducing legislation to stop the Defense Department from spending a single penny on it.
It's pretty rich for Donald Trump to tell retailers that they have to “eat the tariffs”
Meanwhile he’s accepting luxury planes and crypto deals in the Middle East
Donald Trump does more to help himself than to help America
NEWS: Because we fought for it, Trump just finally lifted his stop-work order for Equinor’s Empire Wind off Long Island.
Many thousands of good-paying jobs
Billions of dollars already invested
Clean and affordable power for Long Island homeowners and businesses
I’m introducing a bill to prohibit any foreign aircraft from being used as Air Force One
It'll prohibit DoD from using funds to procure or modify foreign aircraft for presidential flights
Retrofitting the Qatari plane would cost billions and could never even truly eliminate all catastrophic risks
THE NEW YORK KNICKS!
The only logical decision. Of course it’s against the law in America to pick up someone off the street and send them to a foreign prison without due process.
Trump can’t be allowed to shred our laws, Constitution, and our legal right to due process.
Today it’s immigrants. Tomorrow it could be you.
Trump says he cares about combatting antisemitism, meanwhile he keeps hiring, enabling, and empowering dangerous antisemites and white supremacists.
It must end. Now.
17 relatives of El Chapo
Of the head of the Sinaloa Cartel—which the Trump admin designated as a terrorist organization in February
That’s who “tough on the border” Trump just paroled right into America
What, did the cartel offer him a gold-plated helicopter?
It’s dangerous
By cutting SNAP benefits, Republicans are:
Increasing hunger
Increasing poverty
Increasing costs for states and families
Increasing the wealth of the ultra-rich
That’s their idea of a “Big, Beautiful, Bill”
Republicans keep defending their SNAP cuts as "reducing fraud, waste, and abuse."
Which category does a hungry child fall under?
Are they waste? Are they fraud? Or are they abuse?
Donald Trump has no problem deporting U.S. citizens.
But if you’re related to El Chapo, then Donald Trump says come right in!
Republicans love to talk tough about border security, but where are they now? It's a total disgrace.
If Trump's tariffs are causing prices to go up at no fault of the retailer, consumers deserve to know
My bill with @raskin.house.gov will require large retailers to display how much tariffs are contributing to the prices of their products
These tariffs are just a tax hike on consumers
If a retailer as big as Walmart can’t escape the pain of tariffs, what chance does a small business have?
Their customers are inevitably going to see prices rise.
Donald Trump’s tariffs are nothing more than a tax hike on consumers.
Trump’s trade war strikes again.
Walmart has just announced it will raise prices across America due to Trump's tariffs.
His tariff chaos is eating away at retailers, restaurants, small businesses, and estimated to cost families thousands each year.
Donald Trump has once again launched an unprecedented attack on America’s working families.
Donald Trump and Secretary McMahon are trying to raise monthly student loan payments.
And Republicans in Congress are trying to push massive cuts to federal student aid.
The Republicans’ SAVE Act reads like a how-to guide for voter suppression.
It will not pass the United States Senate. Period
Since Trump became president, nobody seems to have benefited more from Middle East deals than him:
Golf courses by the beach
Hotels in Dubai
And now a $400M private jet from Qatar
This is exactly why I issued a hold on all political DOJ nominees until we get answers.
Equinor’s Empire Wind is a major offshore wind project in NY
But Trump suddenly issued a stop work order without justification
Good jobs
Billions spent
All on hold
Trump claims to want energy dominance but this is all just because of a gripe he has about offshore wind and his Scotland golf course
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.