Our kids are the reason we are fighting back.
American families and our kids’ future over billionaires.
⚽️⚽️⚽️
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York
Charles E. Schumer
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 150 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I'm with @momsrising.org fighting back against the harmful Republican plans to cut to health care, child care, and Social Security.
We won't stop working to give our children everything they need to become happy, strong, and prosperous members of society.
Trump’s supposed trade deal with the UK isn’t a triumph of strategy—it’s a product of chaos
Who knows if he’ll actually stick with the “deal” or what he’ll say next
He’s constantly giving everyone whiplash
His cabinet's already lowering expectations
It's the Trump credo: government by chaos
It is equal parts exciting and wonderful that Cardinal Robert Prevost, an American, has been chosen to be the next Pope.
I extend well wishes to our fellow Catholic Americans and Catholics worldwide as they welcome the papacy of Leo XIV.
Telling Americans that you want to axe their health care so that extremely rich people can pay less in taxes is a horrible message.
But Republicans are working overtime to get it done.
That is the definition of cruelty.
No matter which scheme for Medicaid cuts Republicans choose, it will result in millions being kicked off their health insurance.
There's no way for Republicans to accomplish their goal of massive tax giveaways for the wealthy without devastating millions of Americans.
Trump’s tariffs are a painful tax eating away at Americans' hard-earned money
Americans deserve to know who's picking their pockets
My bill with Rep. Raskin will make clear that Trump's promise to lower costs on day 1 was fiction—all for a tariff policy that's sending our economy into a tailspin
Donald Trump is taxing the American people with his tariffs, and they have a right to know exactly how much.
I'm introducing legislation with @raskin.house.gov to require retailers to show consumers precisely how much the tariffs are increasing the prices of their products.
Donald Trump’s trade war is the biggest tax hike on American families in half a century.
It is a gut punch to American families.
This report makes clear the disturbing trend I have been warning about—the rise of antisemitism in America.
Social media has become a breeding ground for antisemitism.
We must not allow this to grow unabated. It’s everyone’s responsibility to fight back against antisemitism.
The Knicks wiping out 20-point deficits twice and Bridges with second monster defensive play on the last shot!
As Yogi said: It's Deja vu all over again!
Go New York! Go New York! GO!!!!
Good. The Trump chaos caused all kinds of problems with the FAA and at Newark Airport that increased delays and safety issues. That should never have been allowed to happen. I’ve been fighting for this—it is time for them to clean up this mess.
The flash firings and chaos at the 9/11 World Trade Center Health Program should have never happened.
Trump and RFK Jr. put key staff and sick 9/11 first responders through a lot of pain with these gratuitous firings.
Once we raised hell, they had no choice but to start fixing this mess.
There is no end to the cruelty of the Republican plan.
They want to rip away healthcare from millions of Americans—millions—to pay for their billionaire tax cut.
Democrats will fight tooth and nail to expose this devastating plan and protect Medicaid.
The Senate Republicans just forced through Frank Bisignano, Mr. Slash-and-Burn himself, as the head of Trump’s Social Security Administration.
They own the dismantling of Social Security.
They are Trump’s enablers, his collaborators, his co-conspirators.
The closer you look at the problems the Trump chaos has caused with the FAA and at Newark Airport, the more alarming the story gets.
The Trump administration is putting air travelers’ safety at risk.
It’s unacceptable.
Dominick from New York
Allison from North Carolina
Andrea from Pennsylvania
Beth from Minnesota
TJ from Wisconsin
Amy from Texas
Small business owners like them are facing the wreckage of Trump’s tariff tax and his reckless economic agenda.
Hear what they have to say:
Senate Republicans just pushed through Mr. Slash-and-Burn Frank Bisignano to be Trump’s head of Social Security.
Every single Senate Democrat voted no.
Make no mistake:
Senate Republicans own the cuts and chaos at Social Security.
Trump’s budget shows how much he’s a conman who does not care about the struggles of everyday Americans.
He'd rather listen to his billionaire buddies than to the American people in terms of what the country needs.
Trump’s FAA has failed to show they’re up to the task of keeping people safe.
On April 28, air traffic controllers overseeing Newark lost all communications with planes in the air for up to 90 seconds risking lives.
We need the Inspector General at the FAA to conduct a full investigation.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.