
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York
Charles E. Schumer
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 784
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 151 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump and DOGE are trying to gut FEMA.
They just fired their own acting administrator who dared to challenge them even once.
And installed a new one whose plans will risk lives and hurt communities when they need help the most.
Mayor Ras Baraka has been released, but he should never have been arrested by Trump to begin with.
I joined Chinatown community members & leaders today whose livelihoods depend on Medicaid
Republicans want to take an axe to Medicaid:
It will hammer our hospitals
Our nursing homes will be decimated
People will lose their jobs
And millions of New Yorkers will lose health care
Trump's firing 92% of staff at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
They’re a critical agency that helps factory workers, farmers, firefighters, and healthcare workers prevent work-related injury, illness, and death.
It’s unconscionable, dangerous, and hurts working people.
I’m standing with @warren.senate.gov to lead Democrats in helping the lawsuit against Trump’s attempts to dismantle the CFPB.
Trump’s entire slash and burn agenda is geared toward making life better for billionaires and big banks and worse for working families.
1000 measles cases.
It’s no coincidence that this has happened after DOGE cancelled $11 billion that went to state and local public health departments.
It’s no coincidence that this has happened after the CDC fired infectious disease experts.
Trump and RFK Jr. must act to stop measles now.
We just learned that there was ANOTHER outage with the FAA in Newark this morning.
Enough.
Trump needs to get it together now and stop risking safety so DOGE can play government.
“See you in court”
That's what the fired members of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission are telling Trump.
Trump doesn't have the power to fire members of USCPSC.
Trump's just mad because we've worked with USCPSC to stop poorly-made lithium-ion batteries from continuing to hurt people.
Our kids are the reason we are fighting back.
American families and our kids’ future over billionaires.
⚽️⚽️⚽️
I'm with @momsrising.org fighting back against the harmful Republican plans to cut to health care, child care, and Social Security.
We won't stop working to give our children everything they need to become happy, strong, and prosperous members of society.
Trump’s supposed trade deal with the UK isn’t a triumph of strategy—it’s a product of chaos
Who knows if he’ll actually stick with the “deal” or what he’ll say next
He’s constantly giving everyone whiplash
His cabinet's already lowering expectations
It's the Trump credo: government by chaos
It is equal parts exciting and wonderful that Cardinal Robert Prevost, an American, has been chosen to be the next Pope.
I extend well wishes to our fellow Catholic Americans and Catholics worldwide as they welcome the papacy of Leo XIV.
Telling Americans that you want to axe their health care so that extremely rich people can pay less in taxes is a horrible message.
But Republicans are working overtime to get it done.
That is the definition of cruelty.
No matter which scheme for Medicaid cuts Republicans choose, it will result in millions being kicked off their health insurance.
There's no way for Republicans to accomplish their goal of massive tax giveaways for the wealthy without devastating millions of Americans.
Trump’s tariffs are a painful tax eating away at Americans' hard-earned money
Americans deserve to know who's picking their pockets
My bill with Rep. Raskin will make clear that Trump's promise to lower costs on day 1 was fiction—all for a tariff policy that's sending our economy into a tailspin
Donald Trump is taxing the American people with his tariffs, and they have a right to know exactly how much.
I'm introducing legislation with @raskin.house.gov to require retailers to show consumers precisely how much the tariffs are increasing the prices of their products.
Donald Trump’s trade war is the biggest tax hike on American families in half a century.
It is a gut punch to American families.
This report makes clear the disturbing trend I have been warning about—the rise of antisemitism in America.
Social media has become a breeding ground for antisemitism.
We must not allow this to grow unabated. It’s everyone’s responsibility to fight back against antisemitism.
The Knicks wiping out 20-point deficits twice and Bridges with second monster defensive play on the last shot!
As Yogi said: It's Deja vu all over again!
Go New York! Go New York! GO!!!!
Good. The Trump chaos caused all kinds of problems with the FAA and at Newark Airport that increased delays and safety issues. That should never have been allowed to happen. I’ve been fighting for this—it is time for them to clean up this mess.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History784 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
784 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (81-15) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (21-75) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (15-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.