SENATOR BOOKER HAS BROKEN THE RECORD.
He’s giving a tour de force on the floor of the Senate.
His eloquence in showing the hypocrisy, the danger, the disaster of the Trump-Musk-DOGE regime, he’s done an amazing job.
He's channeling the emotions so many are feeling.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York
Charles E. Schumer
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 831
Yes29%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 159 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Call your Republican Congressperson to tell ‘em cutting Medicaid to give another tax break to billionaires is not what the American people want.
Reposted byChuck Schumer
Senator Schumer @schumer.senate.gov raised his voice to stand up for Medicaid and Medicare over tax cuts for billionaires.
It's bolstering to see our Senators stand up and raise their voices in this moment.
Let's see some more. Keep up the energy—let's go!
I took to the floor to help @booker.senate.gov because so many Americans will lose health care if Republicans have their way.
Cutting Medicaid and Medicare will hurt seniors, hurt kids, and hurt veterans.
And all just so they can cut taxes for billionaires.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNbr...
The leaders and staff of the Silver Lake Specialized Care and Rehab Center on Staten Island are worried every day that Trump, DOGE, and Republicans in Congress are trying to cut Medicaid.
This center gives care every day to residents and seniors who rely on Medicaid.
SHARE IT:
Trump’s tariffs are a cost-spiking dagger to the heart of Western New York.
From me in @buffalonews.com:
buffalonews.com/opinion/arti...
I just took to the Senate floor to help @booker.senate.gov as he stands up for the American people. www.youtube.com/watch?v=btqa...
NEWS:
How I’m taking the fight over federal spending to Trump country
From the AP:
apnews.com/article/schu...
With their threats to Medicaid, Trump and DOGE are trying to take money away from senior centers and rehab centers like the incredible Silver Lake Specialized Care and Rehab Center on Staten Island.
All so they can give tax breaks to billionaires.
It makes no sense.
I took to the floor to help @booker.senate.gov because so many Americans will lose health care if Republicans have their way.
Cutting Medicaid and Medicare will hurt seniors, hurt kids, and hurt veterans.
And all just so they can cut taxes for billionaires.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNbr...
Donald Trump’s trade war is playing Russian roulette with our economy.
It will be average families and retirees who pay the price.
It's no surprise consumer confidence is at its worst since Trump’s first term.
Americans don't want this Trump economic chaos.
Donald Trump knows his trade war will send costs surging for the American people.
He even said he “couldn’t care less” if automakers raise their prices.
Spoken like a true billionaire.
Let’s be clear:
Donald Trump’s tariffs are a tax hike on American families.
Donald Trump is trying to take a sledgehammer to our economy with tariffs on things Americans buy every day.
The cost of groceries will go up.
The cost of gas will go up.
The cost of everyday goods will go up.
This is money out of the pockets of hardworking Americans.
The Republicans who represent them could, if they wanted to, put a stop to the attacks on Medicaid almost immediately given how small their majority is in the house.
But instead Trump and DOGE are working to kick seniors off Medicaid to give tax cuts to billionaires.
With the looming GOP threat to Medicaid funding, I headed to nursing homes and rehab centers this morning on Staten Island and Long Island to hear from their residents about their fears with these massive cuts.
Those are both in Republican-held House districts.
Good. The courts are blocking Trump’s attempt to fire the financial cop on the beat protecting consumers.
We stand with working families and seniors, and Trump stands with predatory lenders, scam artists, and his billionaire backers.
Trump’s dark-of-night action strips away the ability of hardworking Americans to bargain for better wages and benefits
A dagger to the heart of the middle class
Everything Trump does is in service to his billionaires’ club, while eroding the American dream for working families
What we’ve learned about this Signal chat is shocking.
We need to know if anyone in the chat used personal devices that lack government cybersecurity.
We need to know if there have been other sensitive conversations on unsecure channels.
@democrats.senate.gov are taking action to get answers.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History831 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
831 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17