Does anyone really think Trump will lose his own club’s championship today?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York
Charles E. Schumer
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes29%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 164 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
New Yorkers today came out in the rain to say #HandsOff to the billionaires trying to gut critical benefits and dismantle our democracy.
Thank you for making your voices heard.
www.democratandchronicle.com/picture-gall...
Tonight, Democrats forced votes on amendments to hit the kill switch on Donald Trump’s tariffs, on DOGE, on the attacks against Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid
Instead, Senate Republicans at each opportunity refused—they are chaining themselves to the MAGA anchor and leaping into the ocean
The odds of a recession are surging because of Trump’s tariffs
And with the bill Senate GOP just passed, it’s a brutal Republican pincer move against American families:
Trump’s tariffs raising costs on one side, and Senate GOP cutting Medicaid and pushing billionaire tax breaks on the other
Donald Trump has betrayed the American people.
And in voting for this budget bill, Senate Republicans sided with billionaires, against the middle class, in total obeisance to Donald Trump.
Nero fiddled.
Trump golfed.
Reposted byChuck Schumer
Schumer: "They've actually put tariffs on penguins but not Putin."
Reposted byChuck Schumer
TONIGHT: @schumer.senate.gov joins @lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com on The #LastWord at 10pm ET.
Democrats are exposing the Republican budget on the floor of the U.S. Senate.
Because with their budget:
Billionaires win. Families lose.
Trump’s tariffs are one of the most disastrous and poorly thought-out policies he’s tried yet. And that’s saying a lot.
It’ll cost the average American family $5,000 more each year.
youtu.be/cYCqeuv49R4?...
Reposted byChuck Schumer
Guess Republican Senator Blackburn changed her mind since 2018 about passing the debt onto future generation.
Since she’s about to add...
*checks notes*
$37 trillion to the national debt.
Reposted byChuck Schumer
“What are we gonna do about our national debt? Long term this is the greatest threat to our national security as well as our economy.”
2023 Sen. Marshall should talk to 2025 Sen. Marshall
Because he's gonna flip flip on his grave concern and vote to add $37 trillion to the debt
Reposted byChuck Schumer
Hey here’s Republican Senator Cassidy in April said he wanted to figure out how to pay for extending the Trump tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.
But now he’s gonna flip flop and vote to add $37 trillion to the debt.
So guess he didn't mean it.
www.youtube.com/shorts/RBpBk...
Reposted byChuck Schumer
Here’s just how concerned Senator Barrasso was about the debt in 2013.
Don’t worry though. Now he’s about to vote to add $37 trillion to the debt.
Another Republican flip flop.
Reposted byChuck Schumer
“While the national debt poses a significant economic risk, it also imposes significant security risks.”
That’s right. A Republican flip flop from Senator Cornyn who said this in 2023.
Now he’s gonna vote to add $37 trillion to the debt.
Womp womp.
And the rich get richer.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18