Charles E. Schumer headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
November 23, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 224-6542
Office
322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Charles E. Schumer

Charles Ellis Schumer is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New York, a seat he has held since 1999. A member of the Democratic Party, he has led the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017 and served as Senate Majority Leader from 2021 to 2025. He has served two stints as Senate minority leader, from 2017 to 2021 and since 2025. He became New York's senior senator in 2001, upon Daniel Patrick Moynihan's retirement. Elected to a fifth term in 2022, Schumer surpassed Moynihan and Jacob K. Javits as the longest-serving U.S. senator from New York. He is the dean of New York's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes27%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Charles E. Schumer headshot
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 157 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump and Musk brought their chainsaw to the pockets of over 70M people with the goal of slashing Social Security Their staff cuts will make it harder for Americans to get the benefits they're owed It will hurt our seniors, families, kids Democrats will fight tooth and nail to stop it
This is Dilletta. She’s from the Bronx. And you need to watch her heartbreaking story about how her son’s life is at risk from the cuts to Medicaid that Trump and the Republicans are trying to make to give tax cuts to their billionaires' club. Democrats won't stand for it.
If you can’t get the Social Security you earned because Trump's cutting Social Security staff—that’s a benefits cut If you can’t get answers to your questions or get an issue resolved because no one can take your call—that’s a benefits cut Dems are fighting for Social Security
In a little over one month—Trump, Musk, and Republicans have set in motion the greatest transfer of wealth in favor of billionaires we have seen in modern times. Nothing Trump says during his address tomorrow will change that fact. Democrats are fighting for you.
Trump is pillaging your wallets and wrecking your 401k with his misguided tariffs to give tax cuts to his billionaires’ club. Democrats will not stop fighting for you, for our economy, for your retirement.
It is my profound honor to welcome Orna Neutra and Ruby Chen to the Capitol tomorrow. Both Omer Neutra and Itay Chen, their respective children, were murdered and taken hostage by Hamas on October 7.
Tomorrow, I’m bringing seven incredible New Yorkers to the U.S. Capitol to tell the story of what’s under threat by Trump’s agenda: Medicaid beneficiaries. Disabled veterans fired from the VA. Fired USDA workers. Home health care workers. Democrats are fighting back.
The Trump administration is announcing massive cuts to Social Security staff—more than 7,000 people. Elon Musk is calling Social Security the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time. They’re attacking Social Security, and Democrats are going to fight back for the American people.
Tell the 80 million Americans who worked hard to earn Social Security and depend on their benefits that it’s a Ponzi scheme. Democrats will fight tooth and nail to protect Social Security.
A post from Senator Schumer reads: “Tell the 80 million Americans who worked hard to earn Social Security and depend on their benefits that it’s a Ponzi scheme. Democrats will fight tooth and nail to protect Social Security.”

A post from Jeff Stein reads: “Elon Musk: “Social Security is the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time””
Scientist Inventor Author Historian Dr. Freddie L. Thomas worked at the @UofR Medical Center, developed a Chamber and Perfusion System for General and Specialized In Vitro Studies, and paved the way for future generations in STEM. southwesttribune.com/news/remembe...
Reposted byChuck Schumer
Donald Trump and Elon Musk are trying to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - the agency that helps you if you get scammed. @senatedem.bsky.social are united in defending the CFPB, which has already returned more than $21 billion to families cheated by Wall Street.
Republicans are trying to gut Medicaid so they can give tax breaks to their billionaire buddies. I spoke with thousands of New Yorkers worried about Republicans’ cuts to Medicaid. These New Yorkers were so energized, and we’re ready to fight side-by-side for health care.
I talked with thousands of New Yorkers worried about the attacks from Republicans on Medicaid. Health care advocates. Union members. Concerned New Yorkers from across our state. I'm fighting for them. And we talked together about how to organize to make Americans' voices heard.
Brooklyn's Elizabeth Gloucester was one of the wealthiest Black women of her time She was a business owner, a brave abolitionist, a philanthropist who raised money for the Colored Orphan Asylum She broke barriers and inspired generations to come! www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/o...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-41)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (61-35)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required)
2025-07-22H.R. 3944 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-21End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (44-43)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (46-36)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-34)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-31)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-43)
2025-07-17End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (51-48)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-07-17H.R. 4 (119th)Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (47-50)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (47-52)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESMotion to Recommit Rejected (48-51)
2025-07-16H.R. 4 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-07-15H.R. 4 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-07-15H.R. 4 (119th)Motion to Discharge H.R. 4NONOMotion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 16Next →