Though the Trump Administration failed in this tactic, it’s no secret that they will try to find another, and when they do, it will again be Senate Democrats there to call it out, fight back, and defend American families.
www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York
Charles E. Schumer
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes29%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 164 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Americans fought back, and Donald Trump backed off.
Now Donald Trump needs to rescind Russell Vought’s nomination.
The EEOC has delivered for American workers
In 2024 alone, they returned $700M to workers—their best year ever
But Trump is once again siding with the ultra-wealthy and against you
It hurts workers
It hurts women in the workplace who are STILL paid less than men
It hurts you
Trump is illegally dismantling the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and in the process dismantling workers’ rights to advocate for higher pay, benefits, and workplace safety.
This will hurt working Americans.
Lawless. Destructive. Cruel. Mean. Nasty. Illegal.
That's Trump's order.
Even with a judge pausing it—we must keep fighting because we know Trump'll keep working to slash programs that help Americans.
Speak up about how Trump’s order will hurt YOUR community.
www.youtube.com/shorts/29V_7...
Senate Democrats will keep fighting to protect American communities, seniors, and families from dangerous actions like we saw last night.
Trump's order is blatantly illegal, shortsighted, mean-spirted, and just foolish.
Even though a judge has blocked it for a few days, we know that Trump and Vought will keep pushing to get it done.
RFK Jr. must answer for the conflict of interests he holds with the anti-vaccine movement.
According to his financial disclosures, he has made millions by recommending clients to law firms suing vaccine-makers.
Funding for firefighters is now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Republicans are quite literally defunding the police and raising taxes thanks to Donald Trump’s cruel order.
RFK Jr. is the face of the modern anti-vaccine movement.
He has made a living by actively fighting public health.
And he must answer for spreading wild conspiracies.
Funding for law enforcement is now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Nobody should believe RFK Jr.’s 11th hour conversion on vaccines.
When he comes before the Senate this week:
Democrats will work to hold him accountable for the misinformation he has spread for decades.
Senior centers are now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Meals on Wheels is now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Hospitals—particularly rural hospitals and community health centers—are now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Funding that supports our nation’s mass transit is now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Nonprofits that help disabled veterans are now in danger thanks to Donald Trump.
Virtually any organization, and there are millions, that depends on federal grant money to run its day-to-day operations is now in danger because of Donald Trump’s cruel order.
Hospitals.
Police.
Firefighters.
Senior centers.
Food pantries.
Nonprofits that help disabled veterans.
Mass transit.
On and on and on.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18