Americans are going hungry and this Administration is turning a blind eye.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Washington District 9
Adam Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Adam Smith
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWashington District 9
SoupScore
Adam's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Trump Administration cut food assistance for millions in the Big Ugly Bill.
Now, the Trump Administration is trying to cover their tracks by cancelling a study that monitors hunger and food security -- allowing them to pretend that food insecurity isn't getting worse.
Reposted byRep. Adam Smith
HASC Dems RM @adamsmith.house.gov, CEC Chair @repmarktakano.bsky.social, Co-Chair @repericsorensen.bsky.social, Vice Chair @sarajacobs.house.gov, & @houlahan.house.gov are leading the #FitToServe Act to ensure trans people can serve in the military, including by explicitly ensuring access to care.
Every American deserves a voice in our democracy, despite how some may try to take it.
The Trump administration is looking to access Washington voter registration to justify the President’s false election fraud claims. Your information deserves to stay private, and our elections will remain secure in Washington state.
I’ve introduced legislation to promote a response to behavioral health crises and other emergencies that include trained, unarmed professionals on the national scale, and will continue to support this type of response across the country.
Proud to see this work in Seattle to provide alternative responses to 911 calls.
My statement on vote regarding the resolution honoring Charlie Kirk.
A free and independent press is a cornerstone of our democracy.
Reposted byRep. Adam Smith
Caught up with @adamsmith.house.gov who sits on @democrats-armedservices.house.gov to break down this year’s defense bill. Spoiler Alert: Our military deserves better than to be used as Trump’s political pawn.
The President of the United States is using his power to coerce people into not criticizing him. This completely violates the First Amendment.
It’s past time that this administration understands the economic pain that these chaotic tariffs are inflicting on hardworking people.
President Trump’s haphazard tariffs are taking money out of the pockets of everyday Americans. Consumers will pay $400 more when financing a car, households will lose $2,400 in income, and small business importers have already paid $90,000 in tariffs.
Happy birthday U.S. Air Force! Our country is grateful for the dedication and service that every person in uniform has shown over the past 78 years.
My thoughts on Jimmy Kimmel and the Trump Administration's crackdown on free speech.
My statement on the removal of Jimmy Kimmel.
We lose any sort of bipartisan consensus when we blame political violence on one party. We should say this is wrong no matter who's saying it.
John O’Meara from Issaquah High School won last year’s prize with his app, Tutorable. This year’s competition ends on October 30th, so be sure to enter your app, website, robot, or other design to be considered. For more information, visit www.congressionalappchallenge.us/students/stu....
Today, we celebrate Congressional App Challenge Day. For years, talented, young coders in my district have been submitting their creations to this competition to show their creativity and STEM education.
These individuals were brought to the U.S. as children and have established deep ties in their communities. Secretary Noem’s actions fly in the face of legal protections afforded to Dreamers and rip families apart.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.