Planned Parenthood fills an essential role in the health care landscape providing cancer screenings, reproductive health care and family planning services that thousands of Granite Staters count on.
This ruling is yet another shameful attack on women and their well-being.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 774
Yes41%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Republican megabill includes a drastic assault on food assistance programs, like SNAP.
At the end of the day, it's working Americans who will pay the price for Trump's billionaire tax breaks.
Today marks the 10th anniversary of the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision, which paved the way for marriage equality in America. A decade later, LGBTQ+ rights are under attack.
We must do everything we can to support the LGBTQ+ community.
Too often, military families face high barriers to accessing the affordable child care they need. Proud to introduce a bipartisan bill with Senator Joni Ernst that would create a partnership with the Department of Defense to support workforce development opportunities for child care providers.
The overwhelming majority of Granite Staters reject Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" because it would be a disaster for our state. It would cause 43,000 Granite Staters to lose health coverage and raise food costs for low-income families, all to give more tax breaks to billionaires.
3 years ago, we worked across the aisle to pass the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act—the most significant gun reform in decades.
Trump's GOP-backed Megabill would eliminate common sense safeguards to keep silencers, short-barreled rifles and shotguns out of the wrong hands.
On the anniversary of the disastrous Dobbs decision, I’m helping reintroduce the Women’s Health Protection Act to enshrine the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law—ensuring a woman’s ability to access reproductive care isn’t defined by the zip code she lives in.
That includes doing everything we can to stop Trump's megabill which—between Medicaid cuts and billionaire tax breaks—includes several provisions aimed at limiting access to family planning services that women need. 3/3
The Republican assault on women's reproductive rights did not stop with the Dobbs decision and we must continue fighting to protect and restore access to the full range of reproductive care. 2/3
On the 3rd anniversary of the disastrous, outrageous and deadly Dobbs decision I stand with Granite Staters, and women across the U.S., who are frightened and frustrated by the unending assault on access to reproductive health care and a woman's right to choose. 1/3
53 years ago today, Title IX became the law of the land, striving to make schools safer and more accepting of all.
We must continue to uphold that promise and find ways to make the classroom a welcoming space for every student.
The American public deserves to know whether President Trump is seriously planning to involve the U.S. in the conflict between Iran and Israel. American families need reassurance that their loved ones who live or serve in the area won't be put in harm's way.
Serving on a jury is a civic duty that no one should be prevented from fulfilling because of who they are or who they love. Under current law there are no protections prohibiting discrimination against LGBTQ+ jurors in federal courts.
Our bipartisan bill would change that.
As President Trump weighs U.S. involvement in the current conflict between Israel and Iran, Secretary Hegseth did nothing to reassure me that he has plans to keep safe the Americans and more than 40,000 U.S. troops within striking distance.
42 years ago today, Dr. Sally Ride became the first American woman to go into space. 🚀
Her trailblazing career continues to inspire new generations of women and girls to pursue STEM careers.
Honored to co-lead this year’s bipartisan delegation to the Paris Air Show! As American businesses face higher costs and damaged supply chains, our trip presented an opportunity to convey that Congress values our partners’ roles in our economic wellbeing and national security.
95 years ago today, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was signed into law. That law was the last time tariffs were as high as they are today.
Let's not forget: those tariffs triggered a trade war and exacerbated the Great Depression.
Americans already face a cost-of-living crisis and the president's "Big, Beautiful Bill" will make it worse by driving energy bills through the roof.
This bill goes out of its way to make clean energy more expensive—all as electricity demand is growing. It’s shameful.
We need to be lowering costs for families, but President Trump's tariffs are doing the opposite.
At a time when costs are already through the roof, new parents are being forced to pay 24% higher prices for necessities like car seats, strollers and cribs.
The "Big" in Republicans' Big Beautiful Bill is certainly accurate in one respect: it will make the debt bigger.
Interest rates for mortgages and auto loans will rise. Small businesses will face higher loan repayment costs.
Americans can't afford that.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History774 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
774 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 28 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 3 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 35 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 10 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 11 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.