Medicaid is a lifeline that the Republicans’ “big beautiful bill” will rip away from tens of thousands of Granite Staters.
Taking health care away from families isn’t beautiful, it’s cruel.
newhampshirebulletin.com/2025/07/14/c...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes43%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 93 sponsored · 305 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As I told Bret Baier on Special Report, the Trump admin’s lack of strategy and chaotic cuts are giving China the advantage.
But it's not too late to reverse course, and that starts with rebuilding our soft power—as I laid out in my new minority report with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
From weather forecasts to educational programming, public TV and radio are critical sources of information.
For Americans in rural areas, it's often the only source of news in emergencies.
Cutting funding for public broadcasting is reckless and shameful.
There’s bipartisan consensus around the threat that China poses to American security and prosperity.
Under President Trump, America is retreating from the global stage and China is gaining ground. Is it vital that we reverse course.
If you're an ice cream lover like I am, today is one of the best days of the year: National Ice Cream Day. 🍦
With more than 50 stops on New Hampshire's ice cream trail, I hope Granite Staters everywhere can get a scoop of their favorite flavor today.
www.visitnh.gov/things-to-do...
The truth is, Putin has spent 3 years attacking Ukraine and killing innocent civilians.
It's time for Congress to ramp up pressure in every way—including taking up the bipartisan sanctions bill to stop Putin and deter those who fund his war machine.
The NDAA is critical to Congressional oversight of the Pentagon and for improving the lives of service members.
Proud to have secured wins in the Committee-passed bill that support good jobs, improve child care and housing access, invest in NH’s shipbuilding workforce and more.
Making massive cuts to the Social Security Administration is anything but "efficient," leading to even longer wait times and creating unnecessary chaos.
Reallocating field office staff to answer phones isn't a real solution. America's seniors deserve better.
President Trump's chaotic tariffs are driving up the costs of everyday goods that Granite Staters count on, all while undermining America's relationships with our closest trading partners.
So much for "lowering the price of everything."
President Trump's chaotic tariffs are driving up the costs of everyday goods that Granite Staters count on, all while undermining America's relationships with our closest trading partners.
So much for "lowering the price of everything."
The Republican megabill is a big betrayal of the American people.
Granite Staters know this legislation won't get our economy back on track; instead, it's going to make life more expensive by making it harder for families to afford health care, groceries and energy.
President Trump’s food assistance cuts will cost NH millions and put SNAP benefits at risk for thousands of Granite Staters at time when they are already fighting to stretch every dollar.
This morning, I discussed what these cuts will mean for NH with local leaders.
The Pennichuck Solar Farm is the kind of forward-looking investment we need to increase the supply of energy and lower costs.
The megabill that President Trump and Congressional Republicans jammed through eliminates support for these projects, and New Hampshire will pay more because of it.
July marks Disability Pride Month and the 35th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
1 in 4 Americans live with a disability, and this month is an opportunity to celebrate their strength, resiliency and contributions to our communities.
While not perfect, the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee-passed annual defense bill includes provisions I fought for to improve the lives of service members and their families, invest in New Hampshire and support America's allies and partners abroad.⬇️
www.shaheen.senate.gov/after-securi...
Since its inception, the 14th Amendment has guaranteed citizenship to those born in the U.S.
This ruling is a step in the right direction and rebukes President Trump's illegitimate efforts to violate this fundamental right.
The bottom line: As this trade war continues, prices will keep going up and more businesses will go under.
Enough is enough.
It's time for the President to put American businesses and consumers first and abandon his senseless trade war.
And on top of these direct costs, restaurants, hotels and retail storefronts—from the North Country to the Lakes Region—are watching their consumer base evaporate as Canadians look elsewhere for their summer getaways.
Tariffs on Canadian energy will drive up energy costs for Granite State families and businesses.
Granite State businesses are seeing markets dry up as foreign consumers look to other countries when making purchases.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-21 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.