And of course, then Trump administration senior advisor Ivanka Trump in 2019:
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes41%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Add to the list, a Trump-appointed Pentagon spokesman in 2020:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem introduced the Women, Peace and Security Act in 2017 while serving in the House:
Here’s National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, then a U.S. Representative and Co-Chair of the WPS Caucus that he founded, highlighting WPS last year:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy2R...
Just this month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio—an original cosponsor of the legislation when he served in the Senate—praised WPS:
The Women, Peace and Security program that Secretary Hegseth called “woke” and "weak” was passed by a Republican-led Congress and then signed into law by Trump in 2017.
But don’t take it from me, Trump administration officials have been plenty vocal in their support for WPS:
Hegseth’s unlawful move to end the bipartisan Women, Peace and Security law weakens America’s global standing.
It’s startling that just because the word ‘women’ is in the title, this evidence-based security program has been reduced to a DEI program.
Despite overwhelmingly positive feedback from taxpayers, this administration plans to dismantle the Direct File program. I'm urging the Treasury Secretary and Acting IRS Commissioner to protect and expand this tool that makes tax filing easier and free for millions of Americans.
For Granite Staters like John, Medicaid has allowed them to access the physical and mental health care they need to improve their lives.
Republican cuts to Medicaid would put the vital programs and services that these folks rely on at risk.
www.conwaydailysun.com/berlin_sun/n...
President Trump's reckless trade war isn’t just raising costs for families — it is hurting our defense supply chains and harming our military readiness.
Just this week, I visited a key defense manufacturer in NH that is already facing longer wait times and higher prices.
Let's be honest: Pete Hegseth was never qualified to lead the U.S. Department of Defense.
The chaos the Secretary created at the Pentagon puts our service members and military readiness at risk.
He's not the leader we need at this time.
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov does a great job at talking a lot and saying nothing.
Good to join Margaret Brennan on @facethenation.bsky.social to discuss how it's imperative for the U.S. to sustain pressure on Russia to secure a just and lasting peace for Ukraine.
Federally funded Head Start is vital to bringing affordable child care within reach for working families.
Trump's mass firings of staff at Head Start and plans to completely eliminate the program are unacceptable. I joined my colleagues in demanding an end to this madness.
NH Ball Bearings supports local jobs, contributes to our national defense and strengthens U.S. military readiness. I appreciated hearing from them this week about the higher costs and uncertainty they’re facing due to the Trump administration’s reckless trade war.
The YMCA of Greater Nashua’s Merrimack Branch is a terrific resource for Granite State families. It was great to visit today and discuss more ways to address New Hampshire's child care affordability crisis and provider shortage.
I led a discussion at NAMI in Concord to underscore the consequences of Trump’s reckless cuts to life-saving health services.
I won't stand for federal funding cuts that make it harder for folks struggling with mental illness and substance use disorder to access services.
This Holocaust Remembrance Day, I join all Granite Staters in mourning the millions of Jewish lives that were senselessly and horrifically taken during the Holocaust.
It's as important as ever that we stand side-by-side to denounce antisemitism wherever and whenever we see it.
The truth is, if Trump and Republicans cut Medicaid funding, only America's wealthiest will benefit.
I visited Valley Regional Hospital because it's communities like Claremont, NH that would be hurt most when hospitals can’t get reimbursed for health care through Medicaid.
I was incredibly pleased to see firsthand how the vibrant new LaValley Family Community Center fosters a sense of community and boosts quality of life for the entire Newport region. Proud to have worked with advocates to secure funding that helped bring this project to life.
Trump and Republicans need to be reminded just how vital Medicaid is for families.
I held a roundtable in the Lakes Region today to hear from some of the Granite Staters who would be impacted if Congressional Republicans follow through with their plan to slash Medicaid.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16