Today marks 1 year since the first national PFAS drinking water standards were established.
Too many Granite State families and communities have been impacted by PFAS contamination. I’ll keep working to support research and clean up efforts while holding polluters accountable.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes41%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
While Republicans are working to pass tax breaks for billionaires, Democrats are working to pass tax cuts for families and workers.
Our legislation would expand the transformational Child Tax Credit for families and the Earned Income Tax Credit for workers.
I'm introducing legislation to prohibit Special Government Employees like Elon Musk from raking in federal dollars in government contracts at the expense of taxpayers.
Those who step up to serve the public should not stand to benefit in private.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Trump’s tariffs are a tax hike on the middle class – the largest tax increase in more than 40 years.
Trump’s short-sighted tariffs are a tax hike on American families—jacking up the price of gas, groceries, electronics, cars and everything in between.
I joined my colleagues in introducing a resolution to force the administration to reverse course before it does irreparable harm.
The Trump Administration's decision to indiscriminately fire staff at the Office of Head Start and the Office of Child Care will harm child care assistance programs’ ability to serve working families.
We're pushing back.
In the middle of Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month, firings at the CDC by the Trump administration could jeopardize critical efforts to prevent sexual violence.
Leaving educators at rape crisis centers in NH and across the U.S. in the dark does nothing to make our communities safer.
I was pleased to join folks in Manchester who are willing to speak out about the harm that will come if President Trump fires thousands of Veterans Affairs employees.
Crippling the Department won't make services better, it’ll make it harder for veterans to access the care they deserve.
For every $1 white, non-Hispanic men earn, Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander women earn 83¢.
On #AANHPIEqualPay Day, we recommit to closing the wage gap so that we can achieve a society where everyone can thrive.
In President Trump’s own words, he ‘couldn’t care less’ if prices go up.
He doesn’t care that families will be the ones who foot the bill.
I have legislation that would stop this tariff tax hike.
Trump promised to lower energy prices for Americans.
Instead, his energy secretary is creating a clean energy “hit list.”
Fact: Investing in clean energy sources is the best way to increase supply and bring costs down.
Trump’s tariff tax hike is a disaster for working class Granite Staters and will leave less money in your pocket.
We just tried to pass an amendment to the Republican budget resolution that would end Trump's inflationary tariffs.
Senate Republicans blocked it.
Donald Trump is directing Senate Republicans to force through a budget resolution that paves the way for a billionaire tax break on the backs of working Americans.
They're targeting school lunch, Medicaid, SNAP and more, all to benefit their rich friends.
New Hampshire's "trigger law" means that the Granite Advantage Program could be eliminated if there are drastic cuts to federal Medicaid funding.
The Republican budget resolution paves the way for Medicaid cuts that could leave 60,000 Granite Staters without health insurance.
Tonight, Republicans are going to push a budget bill that will make tax cuts for billionaires at the expense of vital programs Americans rely on.
We're going to fight all night long if we have to.
Proud to help introduce a bipartisan resolution recognizing National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month and the tireless work by advocates, public safety, law enforcement and health professionals to prevent sexual violence and ensure survivors have what they need to heal.
Today's budget resolution process is all about raising costs on families to free up dollars for tax cuts for billionaires.
Meanwhile, I’m offering dozens of commonsense solutions for Americans grappling with high costs.
www.shaheen.senate.gov/to-improve-r...
Unfreezing millions of dollars to address the substance use and mental health crises would be great news if New Hampshire had joined the lawsuit.
As long as these funds are frozen, Granite Staters' health and well-being will be at risk.
The State needs to step up.
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/03/u...
On this day 57 years ago, we lost Martin Luther King Jr. to a senseless act of violence and injustice.
His leadership, message of peace and faith in citizen engagement lives on and drives our efforts to achieve his vision of full equality under the law.
For most Granite Staters, cars are essential – bringing them to work, school and everywhere in between.
But President Trump "couldn't care less" that his tariffs on automobiles will make buying or repairing a car more expensive and will cause more hardship in our state.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 28 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 3 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 35 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 10 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 11 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.