Jason Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Missouri District 8
Born
June 16, 1980
Age 46
Phone
(202) 225-4404
Office
1011 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Missouri District 8

Jason Smith

Voting Record — 615
Yes78%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jason Smith headshot
Jason Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanMissouri District 8
SoupScore
Jason's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 9 sponsored · 8 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

First Liam Conejo Ramos. Now Liam Tadeo.   How many five-year-old boys need to be taken by ICE before Republicans will admit to the cruelty of this mass deportation campaign? Where is our humanity? How can we justify putting a five-year-old through this?
It’s clear from the grand opening celebration that it’s going to be a real game changer for Saint Paul. Thank you to everyone who came together to make this work!
The building will have over a dozen new classrooms, a brand-new gymnasium and early childhood education programs. But most importantly, 2,000 kids will have a place to learn and grow while their parents work, with scholarships available to make this all more affordable for families.
Childcare providers have a hard time expanding because of the incredible cost. It’s a seemingly endless loop. But in Saint Paul, they’re changing that with the new YMCA Peter J. King Center for Child and Family Wellbeing.
In cities, towns and rural communities alike, I hear the same thing:  the dire need for affordable childcare. Parents can’t start jobs because there’s no one to watch the kids. Businesses can’t expand because there’s no one to fill the jobs.
Corporate consolidation in agriculture is a big part of the reason why food prices continue to go up. There just isn’t enough competition, and we need to do more to give smaller operations a leg up.
At a time of massive consolidation in meatpacking, we have to give local producers more places to go to get their animals processed. This facility gives farmers that local option, strengthening our food system and making our rural communities more resilient, secure and competitive.
Farmers and ranchers need options. They need choices. They need more than just whatever the four big corporations that control meat processing in this country offer. That’s why the new Farmers Union Processing and Meats facility in Staples matters.
Medicaid is often the most common health insurance in rural areas, and when people don’t have health insurance, hospitals like CRMC often foot the bill for uncompensated care at a time when budgets are already tight.
We should be investing in our health care system so we can expand the capabilities of rural hospitals, instead of cutting Medicaid and leaving patients uninsured.
In fact, while most people tend to think world-class clinical trials and innovations are usually directed to bigger cities, CRMC is bringing innovative research to Greater Minnesota, including an international clinical trial that may help us combat Type 2 diabetes.
Cuyuna Regional Medical Center (CRMC) is a 25-bed hospital in Crosby with clinics across north-central Minnesota. Patients can access primary and specialty care without having to trek to a big city, and it’s a perfect example of the kind of facility that Minnesotans rely on to stay healthy.
The latest bipartisan housing law we passed this summer will prevent over 9,000 units in Greater Minnesota from falling into disrepair and cuts red tape to spur new housing construction. But there is more to do at all levels to take one the next challenge: insurance costs.
I was able to tour a home being built by Lakes Area Habitat for Humanity in Brainerd as part of a conversation on the housing crisis. Organizations like Lakes Area Habitat are helping solve the housing crisis by building more homes, but tackling skyrocketing insurance costs is the next step.
It can be hundreds of dollars per month on top of your mortgage payments, and every single year, the cost climbs. Home insurance rates jumped 67% for Minnesotans in the last 7 years, with the average homeowner now paying ~$3,500 a year.
Finding a safe and decent place to call home is too expensive in the first place. And for those who can put the money together to own a home, there’s another growing cost: home insurance.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
615 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-09-01H.R. 6500 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYES✓Passed
2026-08-31S. 32 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-08-31S. 307 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-21H. Res. 1438 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-21H.R. 1118 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-20H.R. 8823 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-20H.R. 4541 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-16H.R. 9237 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-07-16H.R. 5362 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2026-07-15H.R. 8595 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNO✕Failed
2026-07-14H.R. 1181 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-14H.R. 1181 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-07-14H.R. 139 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-14H. Res. 1423 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-14H. Res. 1423 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-13H.R. 8897 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-07-13H.R. 3106 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-30H. Res. 1399 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-30H. Con. Res. 108 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Failed
2026-06-30H. Res. 1398 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Failed
2026-06-30H. Res. 1398 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-29H.R. 7128 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-29H.R. 7757 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-25H.R. 2478 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-24H.R. 915 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-24H.R. 7401 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-23H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-23S. 629 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-11H. Res. 1335 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-11H.R. 9238 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Failed
2026-06-10H.R. 8464 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-10H.R. 8464 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-06-10H.R. 8312 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-10H.R. 7892 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-09H.R. 5408 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1140 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2026-06-09S. 2 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-09S. 2 (119th)Motion to CommitNONO✓Failed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1140 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONO✓Passed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1345 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-09H. Res. 1345 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-08H.R. 8428 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-08H.R. 8466 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-06-05H.R. 2913 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 13Next →