A college degree isn't the only ticket to a good paying job - professional apprenticeships are vital to the nation's workforce. We should continue to expand access to apprenticeships so that everyone has a path to a stable, well-paid career.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Tina Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes24%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tina Smith
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Tina's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 290 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Seems the Justices forgot the key words 'binding' and 'enforceable' when they drafted this.
On Veterans Day, alongside the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, we thank Minnesota veterans for their service and sacrifices for our state and country. Their families' quiet sacrifices are honored, and I will continue to fight relentlessly for the support they deserve.
I'm calling for a short-term cessation of hostilities along with 13 other Senators.
We are delivering historic investments in our infrastructure, taking on Big Pharma, lowering energy costs and creating good-paying, union jobs.
Republicans on the other hand? They picked Mike Johnson as Speaker to take this country back decades.
Democrats won’t let that happen.
Speaker Johnson’s home state of Louisiana has one of the highest rates of maternal mortality in the country, yet he wants to make it harder for pregnant women to access life-saving care?
Completely disconnected from reality.
I’ve met a lot of guys like Mike Johnson over the years (guys who want to control the decisions women make about their own bodies and their own lives).
Controlling decisions about abortion is part of it, but not all of it. I’m proud to stand in his way alongside these women.
We won't let up.
Anyone who wants birth control should be able to get birth control – without worrying about endless insurance company hassles.
They’re naïve to think this kind of hate isn’t contributing to exorbitantly high rates of mental illness and suicide for LGBTQ+ kids.
We need to ban conversion therapy and pass the Equality Act — our children deserve so much better than this 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
Good morning. ☕
Mike Johnson's wife runs a counseling service that compares being gay to bestiality and incest.
The new House speaker and his wife, Kelly, have long intertwined their political and business lives. www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-j...
“We will restore sanity to government” is rich coming from the guy who defended throwing gay people in jail and equated them to pedophiles.
Do you still believe gay relationships are comparable to bestiality? Would love to hear how you walk that one back.
Mike Johnson wants to ban abortion nationwide, outlaw medication abortion, and signed an amicus brief to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Republicans are championing him as some sort of "unity candidate" that represents their party.
We should take them at their word.
BREAKING: Minnesota’s Jessica Looman has just been confirmed by the Senate.
Jessica will be an incredible advocate for workers like the waitress whose boss steals her tips or the restaurant manager who isn’t getting paid for overtime.
This is a victory for working families.
Jessica Looman is an effective voice for American workers on the minimum wage, overtime, and child labor protections. I worked with her in Governor Dayton's Administration.
She believes in the promise that all work has dignity and should be respected. I urge my colleagues to support her nomination.
Minnesota is a leader in medical innovation – and we aren't going to slow down. We’ve been designated as a medical technology hub to center us as a global leader in the industry.
I proudly supported the CHIPS and Science Act that is making projects like this possible.
If they have the cash to line executives’ pockets then they can pay their workers what they deserve.
Big news in the fight against HIV right here – we can better reach communities that are still being missed by getting rid of costly barriers patients face while trying to get on PrEP.
That’s exactly why I wrote the PrEP Access and Coverage Act.
That's the power of unions.
Honored to join the Indian Health Board on Indigenous Peoples' Day for the ground blessing of their Menaandawiwe Wellness Campus.
This project will blend modern and traditional medicine, creating a place of healing and connection to nature for Native Americans.
I was honored to celebrate Indigenous Peoples' Day this morning with Native communities in the Twin Cities.
Today is a reminder to acknowledge injustices towards Indigenous peoples past and present and reaffirm our commitment to uplifting Native communities.
I condemn the horrific terrorist attacks by Hamas on Israel, on Shabbat and Simchat Torah/Shemini Atzeret.
These horrible attacks on civilians, the loss of life, and reports of hostage taking are an outrage.
The United States stands in solidarity with Israel.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.