Instead, he's using a well-worn playbook that seeks to consolidate the use of force and improperly turn the military into the enforcers of his political agenda. It should make all of us deeply uncomfortable, because while it’s someone else’s city today, it could be your city tomorrow. (6/10)
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Michigan
Elissa Slotkin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes34%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elissa Slotkin
U.S. SenatorDemocratMichigan
SoupScore
Elissa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 113 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
... in the case of DC, re-hire the National Park Service workers who used to pick up trash in federal parks. (5/10)
Make no mistake, this is NOT about fighting crime. If he truly cared about the safety of these cities, he could use his broad authority to provide police forces in those cities, hire hundreds of new officers, or... (4/10)
On top of LA and DC, the commander in chief laid out his goal of using our cities as military "training grounds" and called on American generals to fight "the war from within." (3/10)
First, and most importantly: they accelerated their case that America is in the middle of a violent insurrection that the military must quell. The President believes he is the hero of his own story and is willing to hurt the standing of the U.S. military to look tough in public. (2/10)
Yesterday’s military spectacle from Secretary Hegseth and President Trump should be seen for what it is: a critical moment in our history and our story as Americans. (1/10)
Since July, I have been very clear: any conversation about my vote needs to start with health care.
My statement ahead of the government funding deadline.
The targeted violence in Grand Blanc was meant to terrorize. And by making us afraid, it is infringing on our freedom. If people don’t feel they are safe in their sanctuaries, that is infringing on their freedom.
Our first responders in Grand Blanc ran toward the danger. They are heroes.
Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin
The White House keeps saying this is about health care for immigrants.
That’s an OUTRIGHT LIE and a blatant attempt to distract you from the fact that they’re trying to increase ALL our premiums – no matter what insurance you have.
Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin
Donald Trump wants to use $20 billion of your money to bail out Argentina.
But here at home, prices are up, employment is down, and we’re on the brink of a shutdown because he won’t address the health care crisis.
A potential federal govt shutdown would have impacts in MI, as does anything happening in DC. Today, I held a virtual town hall with local leaders from across MI, answering their questions about what a shutdown of the federal govt means for their communities, and how my team can help.
If you want my vote, you have to negotiate in good faith and act like adults to pass a budget. The President has violated the Constitution and the law too many times, and I am not just going to take him at his word. I have to see it in black and white.
In Michigan, we've had 5 major mass shootings in 4 years. America has a problem, and we have to acknowledge it and get to work to fix it. (2/2)
youtu.be/gyKZH-6p4R8
Last night, I spoke on the floor of the Senate about the community of Grand Blanc Township, the first responders who heroically acted, and what this means for all of us.
(1/2)
Reposted bySenator Elissa Slotkin
Republicans’ quest to shut down the government is simple: they would rather unleash this havoc than simply keep health care costs stable for millions.
Take a breath. Don't believe every theory you read on social media. What the Grand Blanc community needs more than anything is for all of us to rise above.
That's the message state Rep. Mike Mueller (R-Linden) and I wanted to convey today when we visited with local leaders.
Now is the time for compassion, for comforting those who are grieving, and for standing shoulder to shoulder as one community. (4/4)
In my many conversations, they have consistently focused their work and energy on the community, remained calm and steadfast, and worked as a team for the betterment of the community. (3/4)
Despite the pain, sadness and anger we are feeling after yet another mass shooting, it’s important to take a breath. I encourage everyone to learn from the example of our law enforcement and first responders today. (2/4)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16