Mike Thompson headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 4
Born
January 24, 1951
Age 75
Phone
(202) 225-3311
Office
268 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 4

Mike Thompson

Charles Michael Thompson is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 4th congressional district since 1999. The district, in the outer northern portion of the San Francisco Bay Area, includes all of Lake and Napa counties and parts of Contra Costa, Solano, Yolo and Sonoma counties. Thompson chairs the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force. He is a member of the Democratic Party.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 581
Yes44%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Thompson headshot
Mike Thompson
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 4
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 122 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

It was a heartbreaking and solemn privilege to recognize Officer Matthew Bowen’s legacy on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. Officer Bowen’s selfless dedication to protecting others, even in the face of danger, is a testament to his courage and commitment to public service.
Honored to join the Vacaville Police Department and officers from across our country for National Police Week and the National Police Officers’ Memorial. Grateful for their service and sacrifice- and for the chance to reflect, remember, and stand with our law enforcement community.
Rep. Thompson with Vacaville Police officers
Photo of speaker at Peace Officers Memorial event
Photo of program for the event
On this day 3 years ago, retired police Lieutenant Aaron Salter, Jr., heroically confronted the shooter and was killed after his shots failed to pierce the shooters body armor. Aaron’s heroism saved lives.
So long as House Republicans are slashing health care coverage for 13.7 million Americans, growing our national debt by another $5 trillion, and handing tax breaks to their billionaire donors, we’ll be here fighting back.
These credits delivered over $71.2 billion to their districts, alone. Destroying these credits will kill jobs, give China the upper hand in the race against us for clean energy, and make energy prices higher for Americans. It’s just bad policy.
People won’t magically get better just because Congressional Republicans cut health care for 13.7 million Americans. People will get sick, and hospitals and clinics will be forced to close their doors or cut back on services. Everyone will suffer, especially rural Americans.
Congressional Republicans' tax bill gives low-income Americans $0.72 per day in tax relief. People making over a million dollars get $223 every day. Democrats don't need to make up talking points about how this bill leaves the middle class behind, the facts speak for themselves.
My constituent, Kate, relies on Medicaid to pay for her medical needs. Without this care, she would die. Every American regardless of party stripe should be furious at Congressional Republicans’ attempt to slash health care for those who need the help to fund tax breaks for those who don’t.
Republicans’ tax bill doesn’t have to give middle class Americans pennies while handing huge tax breaks to people who don’t need the help. We can and should work to make our tax code more fair for our middle class.
I’ve heard from a constituent that they’d like me to vote for the Republican tax bill because it prohibits taxes on Social Security. As the Joint Committee on Taxation’s Chief of Staff clarified today, this bill DOES NOT end taxes on Social Security.
Republicans' budget bill slashes healthcare for 13.7 million people, adds trillions to our national debt, and fails to deliver on the promises this Administration made to the American people.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
581 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12