Diseases and health risks don’t take breaks during presidential transitions. Preventing health agencies from communicating with the public is flat out dangerous.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Chris Van Hollen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 788
Yes26%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chris Van Hollen
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Chris's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 60 sponsored · 425 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Climate catastrophes are raging in the U.S. and around the world. At a time when we should be pushing forward in the fight against this crisis, Trump’s executive orders take us backwards — and the American people will suffer the consequences.
We won’t give up in this fight.
Donald Trump ran on lowering costs for working people. But in the first few days of his administration, he’s been focused on pardoning violent criminals and delivering for the Big Tech oligarchs in his inner circle.
The "Golden Age" Trump promised? It's not for working people⬇️
While Trump steps up attacks on qualified, dedicated public servants, they're still working every day to deliver vital services to the American people.
We SHOULD make government more efficient, but not by propping up political cronies and threatening our merit-based civil service.
It bears repeating that one of the first things Trump did after taking office was to pardon rioters who **assaulted and bloodied police officers**
The "law and order" president gave law enforcement the finger before they'd even changed the curtains in the White House.
Trump and Senate Republicans said they'd be laser-focused on cutting costs for working people.
And yet today — in one of their first actions — they're taking up a bill that villainizes doctors and reproductive care.
It's becoming clear that working people aren't their priority.
Surprise surprise: one of Trump's first moves was to roll back important efforts to lower prescription drug costs for Americans on Medicare and Medicaid.
So the guy who ran on "lowering prices" is doing the opposite as he does the bidding of Big Pharma and mega corporations.
As we mark 15 years since the Citizens United decision, it's hard to overstate how much damage it has done to our democracy — unleashing a flood of special interest dark money and poisoning our politics.
We must pass the DISCLOSE Act to bring transparency back to our elections.
Pete Hegseth is unqualified and unfit to lead the Department of Defense. These latest sworn statements are further evidence of disturbing and outrageous conduct.
Is this really who Republicans want to entrust with the lives of our men and women in uniform?
It's no accident that Trump talked about a new "golden age" with the billionaires sitting in the front row.
He wants it for THEM — not for working people.
Admiral Fagan has served our country with distinction and played a pivotal role in our response to the Key Bridge collapse.
This politically motivated firing is outrageous and sends all the wrong signals to our men and women in uniform.
The January 6th rioters attacked the U.S. Capitol and tried to overthrow our democracy.
They assaulted and bloodied police officers.
To pardon them shows contempt for law enforcement, for the rule of law, and for our justice system and Constitution.
The fact that the Big Tech oligarchy had better seats than Trump's own cabinet speaks volumes about his priorities as president.
We will fight tooth and nail to ensure we deliver for working people — not the billionaire tech titans in Trump’s inner circle⬇️
I'm all for government efficiency, but Trump is coming after our nonpartisan federal civil service to replace them with his cronies.
I'll keep supporting our federal workers so that Americans don't see disruptions in their social security, food safety, and more.
Today, the President painted a dystopian picture of America that was full of lies and distortions. Our country does face clear challenges, but most of the “solutions” President Trump outlined will not fix them.
My full statement on President Trump's Inaugural Address:
Cecile Richards spent her life fighting for health care, reproductive rights, and freedom for all. She was a champion for women at a pivotal time, and will be greatly missed.
My thoughts are with her loved ones during this difficult time.
As part of a weekend of celebrating Dr. King’s legacy, I was honored to attend the Alpha Phi Alpha MLK Scholarship Breakfast with Sen. Alsobrooks, Rep. Raskin and hundreds of Montgomery County leaders and activists on Saturday.
We must carry his legacy on #MLKDay and every day.
Dr. King taught us that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”
Today more than ever, we must take his words of hope and turn them into action — doing all we can to fight for equal rights, economic justice, democracy, and equality for all.
If we’re looking for ways to make government more efficient, we should look at the agency that makes up more than HALF of our discretionary spending: the Department of Defense.
THAT'S where we can save taxpayer dollars — and we can do it without compromising military strength⬇️
🚨NEWS: Today the Biden Admin announced 15 new drugs to be included in the second round of Medicare price negotiations!
This means even more Americans will soon save money thanks to our work to empower Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices. Reminder: every Republican voted NO.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History788 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
788 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.