To our friend Ben — to my friend Ben — thank you.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Chris Van Hollen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 788
Yes26%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Chris Van Hollen
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Chris's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 60 sponsored · 425 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
All workers should be able to unionize and collectively bargain for better pay and working conditions.
I stand with the Amazon Teamsters who are making their voices heard. Amazon must follow the law, recognize their union and join them at the bargaining table.
I’m glad we were able to avoid a harmful government shutdown tonight and deliver full federal funding to rebuild the Key Bridge. My statement:
Despite all the Republican chaos, I’m glad the House finally passed a bill to keep the government open and deliver vital disaster relief — including FULL federal funding to rebuild the Key Bridge!
I look forward to voting for it tonight & avoiding a harmful government shutdown.
We seek a united, inclusive, stable Syria for all Syrians — and supporting our Syrian Kurdish partners is essential to accomplishing that goal. (2/2)
Attacks by Turkish-backed forces on our Syrian Kurdish partners undermine regional security and efforts to prevent an ISIS resurgence.
Today Senator Graham and I introduced a bill to impose sanctions on Turkey — which we should enact if they do not accept a ceasefire and demilitarized zone. (1/2)
Yesterday, Republicans blocked my effort to confirm 10 nonpartisan judges for Washington, D.C. These are NOT federal judges — but because of absurd current law, they must be confirmed by the Senate.
Yet another example of needless, damaging GOP obstruction.
Governing by chaos is back, but it's telling that this time we don't know who's calling the shots — Musk, Trump or Johnson.
Here's what we do know: we need to fund the government and deliver disaster relief to our communities NOW.
It's time for House Republicans to do their job.
This has been our goal ever since that awful day the bridge collapsed. Now we need to get it passed before government funding expires this weekend. (2/2)
Good news! Working alongside Senator Cardin, Congressman Mfume and Governor Moore, I'm thrilled to announce we’ve secured full federal funding to rebuild the Key Bridge in the bipartisan year-end spending bill. (1/2)
Attacks from Turkish-backed forces on our Syrian Kurdish partners undermine regional security and efforts to prevent an ISIS resurgence. Turkey must accept a ceasefire and demilitarized zone or we’ll move forward with bipartisan sanctions legislation.
My statement with Senator Graham:
Let's be clear: getting rid of experienced, nonpolitical civil servants in vital agencies and replacing them with MAGA loyalists isn't government efficiency — it's political cronyism and a recipe for corruption.
We can and should make the government work better. This isn't how.
It's great to see a byline from Evan Gershkovich — who never stopped reporting during his 16 months in captivity.
A must-read on the Russian spy unit that arrested him and countless others as part of Putin's increasingly brutal repression campaign:
Huge overdraft fees burn a hole in the pockets of hard-working Americans while enriching big banks and their CEOs.
I've worked for years to tackle these sham fees, and I'm glad to see this finalized action to ensure big banks can't profit off those who are just trying to get by.
Attacks from Turkish-backed militants are making it harder for the U.S. and our partners, the Kurds, to prevent ISIS from reorganizing in Syria.
These attacks must stop — we cannot allow ISIS to regain its footing during this uncertain transition period.
As Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress push for more tax cuts for billionaires, let's recap all the failed promises they made last time around⬇️
Americans already pay too much for groceries — a Kroger-Albertsons merger risked raising prices even higher and reducing competition across the board.
Bottom line: it would've hurt consumers while helping ultra-rich CEOs. Glad the FTC and courts weighed in.
Republicans want to cut taxes for billionaires with one hand while slashing Medicare and Social Security with the other. We won't stand for it — and neither will the American people.
Medicare coverage for telehealth is set to expire on 12/31 — increasing barriers to care for those who depend on telehealth, including seniors, people with disabilities and underserved communities.
We're fighting to extend this coverage so no one loses access to the care they need.
We've worked to make health care through the ACA more affordable — allowing more Americans than ever to get covered. But if Republicans allow those savings to expire next year, millions will lose their coverage.
It would be a nightmare for working families.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History788 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
788 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-21 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-50) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Motion to Discharge H.R. 4 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.