Huge overdraft fees burn a hole in the pockets of hard-working Americans while enriching big banks and their CEOs.
I've worked for years to tackle these sham fees, and I'm glad to see this finalized action to ensure big banks can't profit off those who are just trying to get by.

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Chris Van Hollen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 837
Yes27%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Chris Van Hollen
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Chris's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 61 sponsored · 437 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Attacks from Turkish-backed militants are making it harder for the U.S. and our partners, the Kurds, to prevent ISIS from reorganizing in Syria.
These attacks must stop — we cannot allow ISIS to regain its footing during this uncertain transition period.
As Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress push for more tax cuts for billionaires, let's recap all the failed promises they made last time around⬇️
Americans already pay too much for groceries — a Kroger-Albertsons merger risked raising prices even higher and reducing competition across the board.
Bottom line: it would've hurt consumers while helping ultra-rich CEOs. Glad the FTC and courts weighed in.
Republicans want to cut taxes for billionaires with one hand while slashing Medicare and Social Security with the other. We won't stand for it — and neither will the American people.
Medicare coverage for telehealth is set to expire on 12/31 — increasing barriers to care for those who depend on telehealth, including seniors, people with disabilities and underserved communities.
We're fighting to extend this coverage so no one loses access to the care they need.
We've worked to make health care through the ACA more affordable — allowing more Americans than ever to get covered. But if Republicans allow those savings to expire next year, millions will lose their coverage.
It would be a nightmare for working families.
We hear the same song every time Republicans come to power: tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy will trickle down to working people and grow our economy.
Well guess what? It has never worked. Not once.
We need to cut costs for working families — not give handouts to billionaires.
These kinds of harmful chemicals don't belong on grocery shelves or in Americans’ homes. Glad to see this move from the Biden Administration that puts public health over private profit.
This is also a critical moment in our efforts to bring home Austin Tice — an American veteran, journalist and beloved son who was detained in Syria 12 years ago.
I met with his parents last week and reiterated our commitment to bring him back. We can’t stop working until he’s home.
As we bid good riddance to Assad, and hope for a better future for the Syrian people, we must remain vigilant regarding the threat of ISIS and continue to support our partners the Syrian Kurds. This is not a time to let our guard down.
Yet another example of the CFPB returning money to Americans wronged by deceptive financial schemes.
We need to make it clear to Elon Musk: abolishing the CFPB won't make government more efficient — it'll just make it easier for scammers to cheat consumers.
Elijah Cummings was a tireless fighter for democracy, opportunity and justice for all.
The House's passage of the bill I authored with Senator Cardin and Congressman Mfume is an important step in our effort to recognize his work on behalf of Baltimore, Maryland and all Americans.
It's been 69 years since Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat — a protest for justice that sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott and changed the course of U.S. history.
We must continue to honor her legacy by fighting inequality, oppression, and injustice in all its forms.
One thing that will do nothing to help working families: another deficit-bloating handout for billionaires and mega corporations.
And yet, that's exactly what Trump and Republicans in Congress are gearing up to do.
Look, everyone agrees government should work more efficiently.
But let's be clear about what Trump actually wants to do: he wants to stack vital agencies with an army of unqualified loyalists.
That's not efficiency — it's political cronyism and it will hurt the American people.
One of my favorite parts of this job is when I get to visit the Maryland small businesses that bring our communities together and power our local economies.
On #SmallBusinessSaturday and every day, remember to #ShopLocal and support entrepreneurs and small businesses near you!
As Lincoln reminded us in his Thanksgiving proclamation, even our darkest times have brought reason for optimism and giving thanks.
Today I’m thankful for all who fight for freedom, justice, human rights and democracy.
From my family to yours, wishing you a happy Thanksgiving!
These threats of violence against Trump nominees are unacceptable. Anyone making them must be prosecuted and help accountable.
The CFPB has returned over $20 BILLION to consumers who've been victims of shady financial schemes and abusive practices.
‘Deleting’ it would not make government more efficient — it would just make it easier for big money interests to line their pockets while ripping off working people.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History837 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
837 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-21 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-50) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Motion to Discharge H.R. 4 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.