Millions of Americans are about to see their premiums practically double overnight. All so Trump’s billionaire buddies could get another tax cut.
Congress must step in to fix this NOW.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Georgia
Raphael G. Warnock
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 828
Yes34%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Raphael G. Warnock
U.S. SenatorDemocratGeorgia
SoupScore
Raphael G.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 172 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
For me and so many in my generation, Malcolm-Jamal Warner was a part of our childhood, a brother whose character “Theo” felt like one of my own. May God grant peace to his soul, strength and grace to his grieving family. 🙏🏾
This is gross negligence of justice.
It’s shameful that this administration is attempting to subvert justice in a case where the defendant was convicted by a jury of his peers.
Breonna Taylor’s life mattered and I will continue to demand accountability for her death.
If Republicans in Washington are serious about getting the debt under control, I encourage them to join me in rolling back the massive tax cuts for billionaires they just passed.
Instead, they’re focused on shameless publicity stunts like defunding public broadcasting.
I’m leading an effort to end bias & discrimination in home appraisals.
Studies show racial bias persists in the home buying and selling process which has made it more difficult for Black families to build wealth.
My new Appraisal Modernization Act will help ensure homes receive fair valuations.
If Republicans want to get serious about cutting the debt, they can join me in rolling back the $4 trillion in tax cuts they gave to billionaires two weeks ago on the back of ordinary people.
Thanks for the donut!
This administration has continued to show that they’re not working for ordinary people.
Adding medical debt BACK on to credit reports is just the latest example.
You shouldn't be denied a home loan because you couldn't pay an emergency medical bill.
Don’t lecture me about fiscal responsibility and then turn around and pass a multi-trillion dollar giveaway for billionaires and corporations.
We need to get serious about fixing the debt and that starts by rolling back the billionaire tax giveaway the GOP just passed.
Public Broadcasting: $1 billion
Tax cuts for billionaires: $4 trillion
Defunding Elmo is not going to fix our debt problem.
This administration is adding medical debt BACK onto credit reports. A trip to the ER shouldn't bankrupt you or prevent you from getting a mortgage.
I fought for years to successfully remove medical debt from credit reports and I’ll keep fighting the administration on this.
Under the cover of darkness, Republicans in Washington slashed funding for the disaster warning system and public broadcasting.
All to save 0.2% of what they just spent on tax breaks for billionaires.
It’s wrong. I’ll keep fighting these reckless cuts.
I voted YES on an amendment to protect children's educational TV programs like Sesame Street from being defunded by DOGE cuts.
Unfortunately, Republicans voted it down and chose to defund Big Bird.
I just voted NO on DOGE cuts to the Emergency Alert System. Sadly, DC Republicans are forcing these cuts through.
That means you'll have less notice if you need to evacuate from a flood, fire, hurricane, or tornado.
Shameful.
Republicans in DC want to shut down USAID and dismantle the backbone of US soft power to save a tiny fraction of what they just spent on tax cuts for billionaires.
It’s counterproductive. We will all pay for these cuts with our safety for generations to come.
Here are some letters I received from a group of kids whose parents were wrongfully fired from their federal jobs.
I’ll keep fighting for our federal workers, because public servants who keep us safe shouldn’t be caught in the middle of reckless political games.
Rural radio and TV stations across Georgia are in danger of losing funding.
The DOGE cuts moving through Congress right now would cut critical funding for local news in rural areas.
I will be voting NO.
I promised these kids of unjustly fired federal workers that I will not stop fighting for them.
I'm proud to stand up for public servants at CDC, USAID, and Department of State, who for so long have done the invisible work keeping our country safe, secure, and more prosperous.
The DOGE cuts to USAID are coming up for a vote in Congress.
For every dollar we cut on foreign aid, our military spends two dollars on ammo.
These cuts are counterproductive and will harm our national security. I will not stand by while this administration puts us all at risk.
The DOGE cuts moving through Congress right now will only cover 0.2% of the billionaire tax giveaway that Republicans in Washington just passed.
Yet these cuts will cost lives and harm our national security for decades to come.
This isn’t fiscal responsibility. It’s recklessness.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History828 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
828 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17