Don’t let them try and make this go away.
Hegseth must release the full, UNEDITED video of the boat strike to all Americans.
Everyone deserves to be able to see and judge for themselves if this man should stay in this role.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Virginia
Mark R. Warner
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes35%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align89%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mark R. Warner
U.S. SenatorDemocratVirginia
SoupScore
Mark R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 165 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
24 million Americans will pay more for their health insurance next year if Trump doesn’t come to the table and negotiate.
Democrats have a plan to prevent it. Republicans just don’t seem to care.
The median age of a first-time home buyer is now 40 YEARS OLD.
That’s an absolute crisis.
And House Republicans just tanked our broadly bipartisan and Senate-passed bill to create more homes and lower costs for all.
I saw an incredibly disturbing video of the U.S. attacking survivors of a capsized boat in the Caribbean.
All of Congress and the American people deserve to see the full, unedited video of the boat strikes and make their own judgments.
There’s no ambiguity anymore. Independent investigators revealed Hegseth endangered servicemembers’ lives.
How is this man still in a job he’s dangerously bad at?
Families are struggling to keep a roof over their heads, yet Trump and House Republicans are refusing to lower the cost of housing. Make it make sense.
Donald Trump ran on lowering costs.
Now he refuses to negotiate on the simplest and easiest way to ensure millions of Americans don’t face skyrocketing insurance costs.
All he has to do is extend existing credits to prevent massive upheaval. He refuses to do the bare minimum.
If you want to read more about the provisions of the ROAD to Housing Act, read more on my website here:
www.warner.senate.gov/public/index...
But it would have been a meaningful, important first step that provided real relief. And Republicans won’t even let us get that done. It’s inexcusable.
This is just SOME of what the bill contained. It was always just a first step, there’s a hell of a lot more we need to do to truly lower rents and mortgages for the millions of American struggling with skyrocketing costs.
It contained targeted fixes for some of the barriers rural communities face in financing new home construction. It also would have improved financing transparency for veterans to support access to more affordable mortgage options.
It included the Build More Housing Near Transit Act, to support a future where it’s easier to build housing near robust public transit hubs, so folks are better connected to work, businesses, and friends.
It would have extended grants and forgivable loans to low- and moderate-income homeowners for critical home repairs, which would preserve existing affordable housing and keep folks in their homes.
A lot of issues to construction are local – this bill would have helped localities develop best-practice zoning and land-use frameworks to help overcome barriers to new housing construction.
The bill would have helped communities convert vacant buildings into affordable homes – including abandoned hotels, warehouses, and strip malls – which would create more housing more quickly and at a lower cost.
House Republicans just tanked a bipartisan piece of federal legislation to lower housing costs.
I want to highlight just some of what was in this critical bill and why this is such a loss for Americans.
I know firsthand from my mother’s own battle with Alzheimer’s how hard this disease hits families. I’m wishing Andy and his family the best as they navigate his dad’s diagnosis.
There’s so much more we can and should do to support families in this position.
Months after killing Democrats’ plan to extend tax credits that lower the cost of YOUR insurance, Republicans still have NO plan to prevent YOUR premiums from skyrocketing.
While millions of Americans are about to see their costs increase, Republicans are twiddling their thumbs.
Unbelievable – House Republicans just killed the first broadly bipartisan housing affordability bill, which would have been a great first step towards lowering skyrocketing rents & mortgages.
Republicans are actively torpedoing progress towards lowering your rent.
Trump and Pete Hegseth are disrespecting our uniformed military, undermining the integrity of the intelligence community, and going after the FBI and independent agencies.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (45-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (46-52) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S. 1582 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31) |
| 2025-05-19 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-19 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-05-15 | S. Res. 195 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-05-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-08 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 60 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 7 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 13 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 61 | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 31 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 75 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 49 | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 42 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.