PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Mark R. Warner headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Virginia
Born
December 15, 1954
Age 71
Phone
(202) 224-2023
Office
703 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Virginia

Mark R. Warner

Mark Robert Warner is an American businessman and politician serving as the senior United States senator from Virginia, a seat he has held since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, Warner served as the 69th governor of Virginia from 2002 to 2006. He is vice chair of the Senate Democratic Caucus and vice chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes35%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MarkWarnerFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Mark R. Warner headshot
Mark R. Warner
U.S. SenatorDemocratVirginia
SoupScore
Mark R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 170 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 17(source)
Just a few months after the terrible damage of Helene, I’m heartbroken to see communities across Southwest Virginia once again struck by flooding. I’ll always push with Rep Griffith and @kaine.senate.gov to make sure Southwest Virginians have what they need to build back stronger.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 16(source)
I’m continuing to closely follow the severe storms across the Commonwealth this weekend — continue to stay weather-aware, check in on vulnerable neighbors, and stay off the roads if you can.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 14(source)
THIRTY percent of federal workers are veterans… compared to five percent in the rest of the workforce. When the Trump-Musk administration does their indiscriminate firings, veterans disproportionately pay the price.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 13(source)
Look, I am all in for maximizing government efficiency. I even passed a law that got way more transparency into how we’re spending. But taking a hatchet to all federal funding, to agencies that save Americans money, to critical medical grants… that just creates chaos & disorder.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 13(source)
For all his talk about bringing costs down “on day 1” inflation has been rising under Trump… and his chaotic tariff plans and funding freezes are sure to further increase costs and make people lose their jobs, too.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 13(source)
For all the recipients of NIH grants across Virginia. For all the kids who shouldn’t have to grow up contracting polio, measles, or mumps. For all the science-based progress we SHOULD be pursing to make Americans healthier. I am a NO on RFK Jr.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 12(source)
Look, we ARE facing a health crisis. I want to do everything I can to fight chronic illness and promote access to healthy food. But RFK ignores science & grifts off stoking fears about vaccines. He’s not going to make Americans healthier. For that reason, I’m a NO on RFK.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 12(source)
Thank you to Saunders Bros Farm for dropping off some incredible Virginia apples for my office!   Going to keep fighting for a more stable trade outlook so our Virginia producers can keep exporting the most delicious apples across the globe.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 11(source)
The CFPB isn’t even funded by your tax dollars… and it’s still raking in BILLIONS in recouped money to help defrauded Americans. The Trump admin isn’t going after it because of “efficiency.” It’s going after it so Elon and other scammers and grifters get a free pass.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 11(source)
Time and time again, we are seeing results: Trump pushes for chaos; we fight back; he backs down. In addition to rescinding the federal funding freeze & several court-ordered pauses, the Trump admin heeded my alarm and backed down on the hiring freeze for some park rangers.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 10(source)
Trump’s admin is: Firing highly-qualified FBI agents that investigate terrorism Freeing Jan 6 rioters who violently assaulted cops Gutting the federal agency that goes after scammers and big banks
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 10(source)
Don’t let them pull the wool over your eyes and call the CFPB “woke and weaponized.” The CFPB fights overdraft and junk fees, goes after lenders that target servicemembers with predatory loans, and has returned $20 billion to Americans. This is a giveaway to scammers & crooks.
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 7(source)
Spending the day hearing directly from Virginians. Glad to answer questions and provide an update on my work in Vienna — thank you to Navy Federal Credit Union for having us & your great work providing banking services for our armed forces!
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialFeb 7(source)
Russ Vought wants to “traumatize the federal workforce.” He’s a key Project 2025 author. He’s a big part of the reason why Head Starts, Community Health Centers, and other essential federal programs are having a hard time accessing funding. I vote HELL NO.
← Newer postsPosts page 64Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESNO✕↔Bill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNO✕↔Amendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYES✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16