CBS canceled Colbert’s show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery.
America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons.
Watch and share his message.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 840
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 73 sponsored · 313 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The independence of the Fed is critical to the stability of our financial markets.
If Donald Trump destroys that, then he tanks our markets and causes more economic pain for Americans.
The independence of the Fed is critical to the stability of our financial markets.
If Donald Trump destroys that, then he tanks our markets and causes more economic pain for Americans.
Paramount/CBS: $16 MILLION
Meta: $22 MILLION
Disney/ABC: $15 MILLION
X: $10 MILLION
Qatar: $400 MILLION luxury jet
Other special interests: unknown MILLIONS
Total: Roughly half a BILLION dollars.
I’ve got a new bill to rein in what looks like corruption in plain sight.
Giant companies (and even a foreign country) are dumping roughly HALF A BILLION dollars into Donald Trump’s presidential library — while they might be looking for favors from Trump.
Here are just a few:
If the President does not change course, the one-two-three punch of his tariff chaos, deficit-busting tax giveaways for billionaires, and financial deregulation could eventually blow up our economy.
And, once again, the pain will fall mostly on America’s working families.
Are you saving for retirement with a 401(K)? Donald Trump is ready to help private equity billionaires make money off of you, and I have some serious questions.
Most importantly: will private equity even make you money?
Nobody is fooled by President Trump and Republicans' sudden interest in building renovations — it's clear pretext to fire Fed Chair Powell.
No one should ever have to wonder if a donation to a president’s future library is actually bribery in plain sight.
My new bill would put an end to this potential corruption.
My full statement on the reported decision: www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/min...
While U.S. startups and universities wait months for AI chips, the Trump Admin is green-lighting Nvidia H20 sales to China—just months after banning them.
We should be advancing American AI dominance and national security—not rewarding CEOs who paid for dinner with Trump.
Donald Trump wants to GUT already approved funds for public media like Sesame Street, NPR, and your local stations.
If he gets away with this, next time he’ll going after your community’s funding for education, housing, climate, you name it.
We've got to sound the alarm.
Government should work for the people, not whichever giant company or foreign government can dump the most money into the president's future library.
With costs already out of control, the Trump Administration is choosing to restart interest charges for 8 MILLION student loan borrowers.
I'm pushing Secretary McMahon to stop throwing working people under the bus and reverse course immediately.
Right now, defense contractors are slowing down our troops and costing taxpayers big bucks.
They’ve snuck fine print into military contracts that prevents servicemembers from fixing their own equipment when it breaks.
Senator Sheehy and I are teaming up to put a stop to this.
Trump promised lower prices on “day one.”
Instead, families get higher grocery bills, tariff chaos, and tax cuts for billionaires.
Another promise broken.
After a big financial institution cheated military families for years, the Trump Administration rushes in to let it off the hook.
What a slap in the face to America’s servicemembers.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History840 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
840 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17