Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 871
Yes26%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 340 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Is tonight the night they pop champagne to celebrate the BILLIONS that Trump handed over to them in his "Big Beautiful Bill"?
While Big Tech CEOs kiss the ring, millions of Americans lose their health insurance and struggle to afford groceries.
A month ago, RFK Jr. called his CDC director “unimpeachable.”
Then she refused to sign off on his plan to put little kids’ health at risk, and he fired her.
RFK Jr. should resign.
BREAKING: Trump's Fed Nominee just confirmed to @reed.senate.gov that he will NOT resign from the White House while serving at the Fed.
President Trump is trying to take over the Fed and install his lackeys.
Trump's takeover would make life far more expensive for American families.
President Trump's new Fed nominee claims he is independent — but REFUSES to admit that Donald Trump lost the 2020 election.
Doesn’t sound like independence to me.
And Americans will pay the price.
Donald Trump tried to illegally fire an independent regulator who protects consumers.
But she fought back, sued Trump, and won in court.
Commissioner Slaughter is back on the job fighting to lower costs for families.
A new name is not going to fix ripping health care away from 15 MILLION people to fund tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations.
Republicans in Congress are trying to DEFUND the Department of Education.
That means bigger class sizes and less help for students who need financial aid.
Trump and Republicans got rid of the CFPB's $5 cap on overdraft fees, allowing big banks to keep raking in profits off of struggling Americans.
So just how much money are banks taking from consumers with these predatory fees?
@sanders.senate.gov, @blumenthal.senate.gov, and I are finding out.
Meanwhile, Google / YouTube executives are negotiating with Trump’s lawyers in a separate dubious lawsuit — potentially worth millions of dollars and raising concerns of corruption in plain sight.
First, the court ruled Google’s search business is an illegal monopoly.
But now the judge’s remedies fail to hold Google accountable for breaking the law.
This ruling is a slap on the wrist.
The Trump Justice Department must appeal to break up this Big Tech giant.
It’s corruption, plain and simple.
The Trump administration is LYING about how long people are stuck waiting for help with their Social Security benefits.
I pressed the Social Security Commissioner and got him to agree to an independent investigation.
Instead of fudging the numbers, do your job and help people.
Mayors know just how high housing costs are in their communities.
I was proud to stand with mayors from across Massachusetts in support of the landmark @banking.senate.gov bipartisan housing legislation that will reduce housing costs by boosting housing supply.
Keep an eye on this potential settlement.
Google could pay $$$ to Donald Trump to settle a dubious lawsuit all while Trump’s Justice Department tries to break up Google’s monopoly.
This could be another example of how giant corporations are enabling Trump’s authoritarianism.
Prices are up just in time for back to school.
Thanks, Donald Trump.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History871 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
871 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18