This fight isn't over.
Donald Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” is headed to the House, and we have the power to stop it.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 875
Yes27%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 80 sponsored · 341 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
After 26 hours of fighting on the Senate floor, Republicans voted to rip health care from millions of people and let little babies go hungry. And they cheered.
I'm angry. You should be too. But this fight isn't over.
Going on hour 26, but we're still fighting.
A big win for Massachusetts: Republicans tried to kill off new clean energy projects, but we just forced them to take out that terrible provision.
There’s a lotta awful still in there. But pressure does matter. Keep it up.
We forced vote after vote last night on one question: Should we save health care for millions of Americans by stopping giant tax giveaways for the ultra-wealthy?
Republicans voted NO every single time.
That tells you all you need to know about Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill.”
Republicans snuck in a line that'd make it harder for people to become home care workers for seniors and people with disabilities.
Senator Kim forced a vote to try to take it out.
Republicans voted NO.
Big Tech companies snuck a line into the Republican bill that'd stop local and state governments from having ANY rules about AI for TEN YEARS.
But we fought back — and won!
This fight is not over, but we are not powerless.
Big Tech companies snuck a line into the Republican bill that'd stop local and state governments from having ANY rules about AI for TEN YEARS.
But we fought back — and won!
This fight is not over, but we are not powerless.
Here's the proof: Republicans are only looking out for their millionaire and billionaire friends – and they're willing to gamble with your lives to pay them off.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
If a bill is so bad that you have to exempt entire states from its consequences to win the votes you need—just don't pass the bill!
Why do people in Washington state deserve Medicaid & SNAP cuts, but others don't?
This is plain wrong, and it's just no way to legislate.
Get this: Republicans voted NO to protect Medicaid funding for addiction treatment.
If you’re battling addiction, Republicans are happy to throw you under the bus in order to give a billionaire another tax break.
It’s shameful.
Hard to believe I'm siding with the guy who spent $300 million to get Trump elected, but he's not wrong:
Republicans’ plan to run up the national debt to hand out giant tax breaks to billionaires will be an economic disaster.
Republicans just voted to DEFUND health clinics and deny women basic health care.
@murray.senate.gov forced a vote to try and protect that critical funding.
Republicans voted NO.
In classic Republican fashion—they've found a way to make their "Big Beautiful Bill" even worse.
More cuts to health care.
More money added to the debt.
More Americans suffer.
Senate Republicans have lost their spines—all they do is bow down to Donald Trump and his billionaire donors.
They know this bill will kill people. And they just look the other way.
Republicans just voted NO to save funding for labor and delivery rooms for mommas and babies.
@bluntrochester.senate.gov asked a simple question: do we stand for billionaires or moms and babies?
Republicans voted with the billionaires and threw mommas and babies under the bus. It’s cruel.
Republicans are putting 17 million lives at risk in their “Big Beautiful Bill.”
These are more than just numbers. These are real people who deserve to live a life without worrying they will go broke if they need health care.
USD1—a stablecoin linked to President Trump and his family—is now the second most traded in the world.
Next week, the House is voting on a bill that would let Trump’s crypto cash machine keep growing with no guardrails.
Congress can rein in this corruption—or greenlight it.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
President Trump loves to say he puts “America First.” But his Beautiful-for-Billionaires Bill actually includes tax breaks for sending jobs overseas.
The truth is that Trump’s policies undermine our economy and put billionaires first, America Last.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Republicans are trying to slash funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in their Big, Ugly Bill.
The CFPB has returned $21 billion directly to 205 million Americans scammed by giant banks and corporations.
Democrats are introducing an amendment to stop these cuts.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History875 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
875 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18