Frank Bisignano has made clear he will not stop Trump and Musk’s Social Security chaos.
Today, we’re voting on his nomination. For every American who counts on Social Security, I’m a NO.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Massachusetts
Elizabeth Warren
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 830
Yes26%
No72%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. SenatorDemocratMassachusetts
SoupScore
Elizabeth's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 73 sponsored · 305 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This week, Republicans in Congress are meeting behind closed doors to decide how many people they want to kick off Medicaid.
How many kids will have to lose their health care coverage to fund tax handouts for billionaires?
Tomorrow, the Senate is voting on Trump’s pick to head up Social Security.
I will be voting for every American who counts on Social Security. I'm a hard NO on Frank Bisignano.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren: I've got a message for Donald Trump, for Elon Musk, and for Frank Bisignano, who is the guy who's going to carry out their plans. And that message is get your Hands Off our Social Security!
#HandsOff @warren.senate.gov
We teamed up with the Hyde Square Task Force to expose Stop & Shop for charging higher prices in working class neighborhoods in MA—and we made change. They lowered SOME prices.
But this fight isn't over. We're keeping up the pressure to make sure their grocery prices are fair for families.
"The thing you carry the baby around in" is called a stroller, Donald.
And everyone knows your tariff chaos is making it much more expensive to care for a family.
Nothing says teacher appreciation like gutting the Department of Education and firing half of the people that make the agency run.
Apple defied a court order just so it could steal from app developers and jack up prices for users.
A federal judge called it an “obvious cover-up” and put a stop to it.
This is a huge win for app users, developers, and competition.
The Trump family stablecoin surged to 7th largest in the world because of a shady crypto deal with the United Arab Emirates—a foreign government that will give them a crazy amount of money.
The Senate shouldn’t pass a crypto bill this week to facilitate this kind of corruption.
Donald Trump has no idea what a gallon of gas costs.
I pushed the Army Secretary to stand up for soldiers and he kept his word.
Now, big contractors can no longer block soldiers from fixing their own equipment, which padded profits but weakened national security.
It's a big win. The rest of the military should follow.
Why do Elon "Social Security's a Ponzi scheme" Musk and his DOGE cronies need to stick their fingers in your personal data — your work history, income, benefits, and health records?
Trump and Musk need to get their hands off Americans' Social Security.
Donald Trump’s chaotic tariff polices have created a one-stop-shop for corruption.
Perhaps that’s what Elon Musk means by efficiency.
Donald Trump is weaponizing the IRS against Harvard now, but who will he try to punish next?
Revoke the non-profit status of churches and hospitals? Snatch tax credits from families? Deny deductions for small businesses?
It's illegal and wrong. And it threatens everyone.
Donald Trump’s latest corruption?
A $2 BILLION stablecoin deal with a foreign crypto company that will benefit the Trump family business.
And it gets worse — the Senate is getting ready to bless this kind of grift.
But it's not too late to make changes.
Here's the latest:
Senate Republicans just advanced Trump's nominee to head up Social Security.
He'll rubber-stamp Trump and Musk's attack on the program — slashing services and threatening Americans' benefits.
For every single American who counts on Social Security, I voted NO.
Reposted byElizabeth Warren
Trump wants to spend trillions on a "Golden Dome" missile defense shield — and Musk's SpaceX “just so happens” to be the frontrunner for the contracts.
I led 40+ members of Congress in demanding the Defense Department Inspector General review Musk's influence on the process:
Our country is in a housing crisis and President Trump's tariff chaos is making it worse. Homebuilders expect his tariffs to raise the cost of building a new home by as much as $10,000.
We’re sending a clear message: America can’t afford Trump’s tariffs.
A shady fund backed by a foreign government just announced a $2 billion deal using Trump stablecoins.
The Senate is gearing up to pass stablecoin legislation that will make it easier for Trump's family to line their own pockets.
This is corruption. No senator should support it.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History830 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
830 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17